feat: add production container image - #49
Merged
Merged
Conversation
HoungDev
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 11, 2026 14:31
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
10001withoutuv, test dependencies, the source checkout, or environment filesstack-updevelopment command, Docker Dependabot coverage, and deployment/release documentationSecurity and operations model
The container starts one Uvicorn process and expects migrations to run as a separate release task. The documented runtime uses a read-only root filesystem, a writable
/tmptmpfs, no Linux capabilities, andno-new-privileges. The image healthcheck uses liveness so a dependency outage does not cause a restart loop; readiness remains the traffic-admission signal.Validation
ruff format --check .ruff check .