Chinese: start faq

FAQ_CN.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+% !TEX program = XeLaTeX
+% !TEX encoding = UTF-8
+\documentclass[UTF8,nofonts]{ctexart}
+\setCJKmainfont[BoldFont=STHeiti,ItalicFont=STKaiti]{STSong}
+\setCJKsansfont[BoldFont=STHeiti]{STXihei}
+\setCJKmonofont{STFangsong}
+
+\begin{document}
+
+%daveti: translated on Dec 25, 2016 (Merry Xmas!)
+%NOTE: above is needed for MacTex.
+
+\subsection*{迷你答疑 mini-FAQ}
+
+\par Q: What are prerequisites for reading this book?
+\par A: Basic understanding of C/C++ is desirable.
+
+\par Q: Can I buy Russian/English hardcopy/paper book?
+\par A: Unfortunately no, no publisher got interested in publishing Russian or English version so far.
+Meanwhile, you can ask your favorite copy shop to print/bind it.
+
+\par Q: Is there epub/mobi version?
+\par A: The book is highly dependent on TeX/LaTeX-specific hacks, so converting to HTML (epub/mobi is a set of HTMLs)
+will not be easy.
+
+\par Q: Why should one learn assembly language these days?
+\par A: Unless you are an \ac{OS} developer, you probably don't need to code in assembly\textemdash{}latest compilers (2010s) are much better at performing optimizations than humans \footnote{A very good text about this topic: \InSqBrackets{\AgnerFog}}.
+
+Also, latest \ac{CPU}s are very complex devices and assembly knowledge doesn't really help one to understand their internals.
+
+That being said, there are at least two areas where a good understanding of assembly can be helpful: 
+First and foremost, security/malware research. It is also a good way to gain a better understanding of your compiled code whilst debugging.
+This book is therefore intended for those who want to understand assembly language rather 
+than to code in it, which is why there are many examples of compiler output contained within.
+
+\par Q: I clicked on a hyperlink inside a PDF-document, how do I go back?
+\par A: In Adobe Acrobat Reader click Alt+LeftArrow. In Evince click ``<'' button.
+
+\par Q: May I print this book / use it for teaching?
+\par A: Of course! That's why the book is licensed under the Creative Commons license (CC BY-SA 4.0).
+
+\par Q: Why is this book free? You've done great job. This is suspicious, as many other free things.
+\par A: In my own experience, authors of technical literature do this mostly for self-advertisement purposes. It's not possible to get any decent money from such work.
+
+\par Q: How does one get a job in reverse engineering?
+\par A: There are hiring threads that appear from time to time on reddit, devoted to RE\FNURLREDDIT{}
+(\RedditHiringThread{}).
+Try looking there.
+
+A somewhat related hiring thread can be found in the \q{netsec} subreddit: \NetsecHiringThread{}.
+
+\par Q: I have a question...
+\par A: Send it to me by email (\EMAIL).
+
+\end{document}
+

RE4B-CN.tex

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+\def\CHINESE{}\input{main}