Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade nth-check from 2.0.1 to 2.1.1 #48

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Guigui14460
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade nth-check from 2.0.1 to 2.1.1.

merge advice
As this is a private repository, Snyk-bot does not have access. Therefore, this PR has been created automatically, but appears to have been created by a real user.

✨ Snyk has automatically assigned this pull request, set who gets assigned.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2022-05-23.
Release notes
Package name: nth-check
  • 2.1.1 - 2022-05-23
    • The ESM code had some issues that are now fixed aeeb067

    v2.1.0...v2.1.1

  • 2.1.0 - 2022-05-22

    What's Changed

    • nth-check is now a dual CommonJS and ESM module #206
    • With the new sequence and generate methods, it is now possible to generate a sequence of indices for a given formula #207

    Full Changelog: v2.0.1...v2.1.0

  • 2.0.1 - 2021-09-16

    Fixes:

    • Replace regex with hand-rolled parser for nth-expressions (#9) 9894c1d
      • Ensures parsing will always have linear time complexity.

    Internal:

    • chore(ci): Use GitHub Actions, Dependabot (#10) e02b4dd
    • Bump dependencies

    v2.0.0...v2.0.1

from nth-check GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: nth-check
  • 639fd2a 2.1.1
  • 0eec65b fix(test): Add `moduleNameMapper`
  • aeeb067 fix: Fix ESM
  • 432ebc6 2.1.0
  • 3e8cd1e feat: Add `generate` and `sequence` methods (#207)
  • 57a5c62 feat: Add ESM (#206)
  • 1ce0c7c chore(deps-dev): Bump @ types/node from 17.0.34 to 17.0.35 (#205)
  • eebb040 chore(deps-dev): Bump @ typescript-eslint/parser from 5.24.0 to 5.25.0 (#204)
  • a316aaa chore(deps-dev): Bump @ typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (#203)
  • 454c0de chore(deps-dev): Bump @ typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (#202)
  • c1ce11a chore(deps-dev): Bump @ types/node from 17.0.33 to 17.0.34 (#201)
  • cc2e35a chore(deps-dev): Bump @ typescript-eslint/parser from 5.23.0 to 5.24.0 (#200)
  • 51a36c9 chore(deps-dev): Bump @ types/node from 17.0.32 to 17.0.33 (#199)
  • fda85e6 chore(deps-dev): Bump @ types/node from 17.0.31 to 17.0.32 (#198)
  • 8348e9f chore(deps-dev): Bump @ typescript-eslint/parser from 5.22.0 to 5.23.0 (#197)
  • a14976b chore(deps-dev): Bump @ typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (#196)
  • 8385e9a chore(deps-dev): Bump eslint from 8.14.0 to 8.15.0 (#195)
  • f6e1b80 chore(deps-dev): Bump @ typescript-eslint/parser from 5.21.0 to 5.22.0 (#194)
  • b1e44ea chore(deps-dev): Bump @ types/jest from 27.4.1 to 27.5.0 (#193)
  • 71a4b01 chore(deps-dev): Bump @ typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (#192)
  • f72e1fe chore(deps-dev): Bump @ types/node from 17.0.30 to 17.0.31 (#191)
  • 5ce11d9 chore(deps-dev): Bump @ types/node from 17.0.29 to 17.0.30 (#190)
  • c8fad5c chore(deps-dev): Bump typescript from 4.6.3 to 4.6.4 (#189)
  • 9fd8f14 chore(deps-dev): Bump @ types/node from 17.0.27 to 17.0.29 (#188)

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

👩‍💻 Set who automatically gets assigned

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@Guigui14460 Guigui14460 self-assigned this Jun 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants