Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(bloom-filter): bloom filter applier #5220

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

waynexia
Copy link
Member

@waynexia waynexia commented Dec 24, 2024

Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia [email protected]I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

#5176

What's changed and what's your intention?

This patch:

  • implements basic implement of bloom filter applier
  • scrapes filters from region scan request for bloom filter index applier
  • implements cached reader layer for bloom filter index
  • implements an incremental way to apply bloom filter index after cheaper minmax filter

PR Checklist

Please convert it to a draft if some of the following conditions are not met.

  • I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.
  • This PR requires documentation updates.
  • API changes are backward compatible.
  • Schema or data changes are backward compatible.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. label Dec 24, 2024
Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]>
@zhongzc zhongzc mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2024
19 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@evenyag evenyag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approve at
22:33:31 UTC+8
Wednesday, 25 December 2024

@waynexia waynexia marked this pull request as ready for review December 25, 2024 15:30
@waynexia waynexia requested review from v0y4g3r, zhongzc and a team as code owners December 25, 2024 15:30
src/mito2/src/cache/index/bloom_filter_index.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +375 to +379
let bloom_filter_index_cache = BloomFilterIndexCache::new(
self.index_metadata_size,
self.index_content_size,
self.index_content_page_size,
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added BloomFilter dedicated cache size configuration in #5237

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.54229% with 269 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.71%. Comparing base (5ba8bd0) to head (c3d7a5c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5220      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.01%   83.71%   -0.30%     
==========================================
  Files        1195     1198       +3     
  Lines      222084   222879     +795     
==========================================
+ Hits       186576   186588      +12     
- Misses      35508    36291     +783     

Copy link
Contributor

@zhongzc zhongzc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

most LGTM

Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]>
@waynexia waynexia changed the title feat: bloom filter applier feat(bloom-filter): bloom filter applier Dec 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@evenyag evenyag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remember to fix todos in this PR after we merge #5237

@waynexia waynexia enabled auto-merge December 26, 2024 02:51
@waynexia waynexia added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into GreptimeTeam:main with commit 00ad27d Dec 26, 2024
36 checks passed
@waynexia waynexia deleted the bloom-index-applier branch December 26, 2024 03:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs-not-required This change does not impact docs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants