Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: add Validate() and Check() #186

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

zyy17
Copy link
Collaborator

@zyy17 zyy17 commented Sep 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced validation methods for GreptimeDBCluster and GreptimeDBStandalone, ensuring configurations are correct and resources are available.
    • Added checks for TLS secrets and object storage provider credentials.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling in the Reconcile method by logging warnings for invalid configurations.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined validation logic by removing outdated methods and consolidating checks within the new validation structure.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@zyy17 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 57 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0dd919e and 495ec07.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new validation mechanism for GreptimeDBCluster and GreptimeDBStandalone in the validate.go file. This includes the addition of Validate and Check methods for both structures, which centralize the validation logic. The Reconcile methods in their respective controllers have been refactored to utilize these new methods, enhancing error handling and simplifying the control flow. Several previously existing validation methods have been removed as their functionalities are now encapsulated within the new validation structure.

Changes

Files Change Summary
apis/v1alpha1/validate.go Introduced validation methods for GreptimeDBCluster and GreptimeDBStandalone, including checks for configurations, Kubernetes resources, and secrets. Added multiple helper functions for validation.
controllers/greptimedbcluster/controller.go Refactored Reconcile method to use new validation methods, removed old validation methods, simplifying control flow.
controllers/greptimedbstandalone/controller.go Similar refactor of Reconcile method as in greptimedbcluster, utilizing new validation methods and removing old ones.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: add ,inline tag for toml mapping #183: This PR introduces the k8sutil.GetSecretsData() function, which aligns with the validation and checking functionalities for GreptimeDBCluster and GreptimeDBStandalone in the main PR, particularly in managing Kubernetes secrets.
  • refactor: make sure operator upgrade smooth #187: This PR enhances the upgrade process by introducing the FileStorageType, which relates to the validation logic in the main PR that checks configurations for storage providers, ensuring smoother management of storage types.

Suggested reviewers

  • daviderli614

Poem

In fields of code where rabbits play,
New checks and balances come to stay.
With clusters and standalones, all aligned,
Our validation hops, so well-defined!
Let's celebrate this code delight,
With every bug now out of sight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@daviderli614
Copy link
Member

Can you add a validate_test.go file to test some validity?

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 10

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
controllers/greptimedbstandalone/controller.go (1)

112-115: Add unit tests for the Validate() and Check() methods

To ensure the new Validate() and Check() methods function correctly and to prevent regressions, please add unit tests for these methods. This will improve code reliability and maintainability.

Do you want me to help generate the unit tests or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

Also applies to: 117-120

controllers/greptimedbcluster/controller.go (3)

132-135: Add unit tests for cluster.Validate().

To ensure that the new cluster.Validate() method functions correctly under various conditions, please add unit tests that cover both successful validation and failure scenarios.

Do you want me to help generate the unit tests or open a new GitHub issue to track this task?


137-140: Add unit tests for cluster.Check().

Similarly, please add unit tests for the cluster.Check() method to verify its correctness in different scenarios, including interactions with the Kubernetes client.

Do you want me to help generate the unit tests or open a new GitHub issue to track this task?


132-140: Ensure consistent error handling and logging.

Both cluster.Validate() and cluster.Check() methods return errors that are recorded as events. Consider enhancing the error messages or wrapping the errors with additional context to aid in debugging.

apis/v1alpha1/validate.go (1)

262-263: Correct the field name in error message for consistency.

The error message refers to storageSize, but the method is GetSize(). For consistency, consider changing the error message to size is required in file storage.

Apply this diff to adjust the error message:

-		return fmt.Errorf("storageSize is required in file storage")
+		return fmt.Errorf("size is required in file storage")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between abf79b4 and 0dd919e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • apis/v1alpha1/validate.go (1 hunks)
  • controllers/greptimedbcluster/controller.go (1 hunks)
  • controllers/greptimedbstandalone/controller.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apis/v1alpha1/validate.go (3)

254-255: Use consistent field names in error messages.

The error message refers to name, which aligns with the field GetName(). Ensure that the terminology is consistent throughout the codebase for clarity.


258-259: Use consistent field names in error messages.

The error message mentions mountPath, while the method used is GetMountPath(). This is consistent, but double-check to ensure that the field names match the expected configuration fields.


146-146: Align error message with context for clarity.

The error message could be more specific by indicating that it's the standalone TOML configuration that's invalid.

Refer to the previous suggestion made by daviderli614 to adjust the error message accordingly.

controllers/greptimedbcluster/controller.go Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/greptimedbcluster/controller.go Show resolved Hide resolved
apis/v1alpha1/validate.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
apis/v1alpha1/validate.go Show resolved Hide resolved
apis/v1alpha1/validate.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
apis/v1alpha1/validate.go Show resolved Hide resolved
apis/v1alpha1/validate.go Show resolved Hide resolved
apis/v1alpha1/validate.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@zyy17 zyy17 force-pushed the refactor/add-validation branch 3 times, most recently from 50f06b0 to a1884d1 Compare September 27, 2024 04:33
@zyy17
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zyy17 commented Sep 27, 2024

Can you add a validate_test.go file to test some validity?

done

Copy link
Member

@daviderli614 daviderli614 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants