Skip to content

BREAKING: Converts to Swift Concurrency #166

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NeedleInAJayStack
Copy link
Member

This removes the NIO dependency. It is breaking because it removes all Swift NIO-isms that were present in the public APIs (like EventLoopFuture and EventLoopGroup argument/return types).

paulofaria
paulofaria previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2025
This removes the NIO dependency. It is breaking because it removes all Swift NIO-isms that were present in the public APIs (like EventLoopFuture and EventLoopGroup argument/return types).
@NeedleInAJayStack NeedleInAJayStack changed the title Draft: feat!: Uses swift concurrency under the hood BREAKING: Converts to Swift Concurrency Jun 25, 2025
The intent is to replace it with swift-distributed-tracing integration.
This resolves the race condition caused by the inbox counts and the event delivery. If event delivery happens before the subsequent publish increments the inbox counts, then the counts will be lower than expected. Resolved by just not asking for inbox counts, since they aren't relevant to the test.
This was causing test hangs on macOS
@NeedleInAJayStack
Copy link
Member Author

Hey @adam-fowler & @paulofaria - I managed to get the tests passing, and I think this is ready for you guys to look again. Could you give it a pass on my changes following your comments?

@NeedleInAJayStack NeedleInAJayStack force-pushed the feat/swift-concurrency branch from db77ae5 to c398797 Compare July 5, 2025 06:15
@NeedleInAJayStack NeedleInAJayStack force-pushed the feat/swift-concurrency branch from c398797 to 34268d3 Compare July 5, 2025 06:17
paulofaria
paulofaria previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
@NeedleInAJayStack
Copy link
Member Author

@paulofaria Okay, I'm feeling pretty confident in this - do you mind taking a look at the final changes and approving (again)? Thanks for the review!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants