Skip to content

Conversation

@dialogbox
Copy link

#1356 This image is not supported for CUDA 11.8.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @dialogbox, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the gpu/README.md documentation to ensure accuracy regarding supported Dataproc image versions for specific CUDA configurations. The change prevents users from attempting to utilize an image version that is not compatible with CUDA 11.8, thereby improving clarity and preventing potential issues.

Highlights

  • Documentation Update: Removed the unsupported "2.2-ubuntu22" Dataproc image version from the CUDA 11.8 entry in the gpu/README.md file. This correction ensures the documentation accurately reflects supported configurations.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This change correctly removes the unsupported 2.2-ubuntu22 image version for CUDA 11.8, aligning the documentation with the installation script's logic. I've also suggested updating the other version numbers on the same line to ensure full consistency with the script's defaults.

@cjac
Copy link
Contributor

cjac commented Oct 13, 2025

You are correct. I am going to accept this change into this omnibus I'm shipping shortly. Thank you.

@cjac
Copy link
Contributor

cjac commented Oct 13, 2025

#1363

@cjac
Copy link
Contributor

cjac commented Oct 21, 2025

oops, I missed including this. I'll rebase onto main and propose this change.

@cjac cjac force-pushed the patch-1 branch 3 times, most recently from 05d06db to 85e1ee7 Compare October 21, 2025 20:56
@cjac
Copy link
Contributor

cjac commented Oct 21, 2025

sorry for all the misfires there. That lack of a final newline just didn't want to stick. I'm willing to merge this change now.

@cjac cjac self-requested a review October 21, 2025 21:00
Copy link
Contributor

@cjac cjac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@cjac
Copy link
Contributor

cjac commented Oct 21, 2025

/gcbrun

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants