[WIP] Get ARCore working for 4.x #13
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
paddy-exe
force-pushed
the
get_arcore_working
branch
from
e971ba3
to
8ea81cc
Compare
I tried to orient myself around the guides from David's PR dicussion: godotengine/godot#78859
paddy-exe
force-pushed
the
get_arcore_working
branch
from
8ea81cc
to
2210b8d
Compare
This commit implements the needed methods for the ARCoreInterface class such as * `get_activity()` * `get_surface()` * `is_activity_resumed()` * `get_display_rotation()` -> will be added in ongoing upstream PR: godotengine/godot#77559
|
This last commit implements the needed methods for the ARCoreInterface class such as
Talked about with @m4gr3d on the last GDExtension meeting. |
|
Closing as now no longer needed. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I tried to orient myself around the guides from David's PR dicussion: godotengine/godot#78859
I haven't tested the changes yet. I would like to receive feedback for a good implementation.