-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
readme formatting #7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Thank you for contributing this PR. |
|
Thank you @gitcommitshow for contributing this PR. |
Analysis SummaryThe provided content, "curl says hello," appears to be a placeholder. It does not align with any of the four Diátaxis documentation types (Tutorial, How-To, Reference, Explanation). It is technically inaccurate as Objective Rating Score
Mistake Counts:
Actionable Suggestions
Strengths
|
Analysis SummaryThe provided document appears to be a developer's scratchpad or a project management tracker rather than user-facing documentation. It lists completed features, future tasks, and bugs, which is content for project contributors, not for end-users trying to learn or use the The content does not align with any of the four Diátaxis documentation types (Tutorial, How-To, Reference, Explanation). It lacks a clear user-centric purpose, providing no context, instructions, or explanations. To be effective, the content needs a fundamental restructuring to serve a specific user need, such as installing or using the application. Objective Rating Score
Mistake Counts:
(Note: The high score reflects a low number of discrete errors but belies the document's fundamental unsuitability as user documentation. The core issue is its entire structure and purpose, which is a critical comprehensibility failure.) Actionable SuggestionsThis document requires a complete restructure to become useful for end-users.
Strengths
|
Analysis SummaryThe documentation at ./README.md is currently structured as an internal developer checklist or a set of personal notes rather than user-facing documentation. It completely lacks the fundamental components of a README file, such as a project description, installation instructions, and usage examples. This makes it impossible for a new user to understand the project's purpose or how to use it. The content mixes feature lists with developer-specific to-do lists ("TASKS", "BUGS"), which should be managed in a project management tool like GitHub Issues. The document fails to align with any of the four Diátaxis types and needs a complete structural overhaul to serve its intended audience. Objective Rating Score
Mistake Counts:
Actionable Suggestions
Strengths
|
No description provided.