Mock Data By reflection all Dataset , Locale and methods are shown #3838
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new feature for handling mock data within the Ginger application. It includes the addition of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ValueExpressionEditor
participant ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage
participant ValueExpression
User->>ValueExpressionEditor: Open Value Expression Editor
ValueExpressionEditor->>ValueExpression: Check expression
ValueExpression-->>ValueExpressionEditor: Return expression details
ValueExpressionEditor->>ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage: Create with details
User->>ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage: Edit mock data
ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage->>ValueExpression: Update mock data details
ValueExpression-->>ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage: Return updated details
User->>ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage: Save changes
ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage->>ValueExpressionEditor: Update editor content
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/RosLynLib/CodeProcessor.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-390: General observation: Consistency in error handling and logging.The class
CodeProcessoruses a consistent pattern for logging and error handling across different methods. However, consider using more structured logging and exception handling practices to enhance maintainability and debuggability.Consider enhancing the logging mechanism by including more contextual information and using structured logging where possible.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionEditor.cs (3 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml (1 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/RosLynLib/CodeProcessor.cs (2 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ValueExpressionLib/ValueExpression.cs (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml (1)
1-24: Review of New XAML File:ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xamlThis new XAML file defines a UI page for editing mock data expressions. The namespaces and resources are correctly defined. The UI layout with
GridandRowDefinitionsis standard and appropriate for the described functionality.
- Namespace and Resource Definitions: The namespaces including
GingerCoreandlocalare correctly associated, ensuring access to necessary classes and controls within the project.- UI Components: The
LabelandListVieware well-defined with appropriate styles and bindings. TheLabeluses aTextDicResourcefor localization support, which is good for maintainability and internationalization.Overall, the structure and definitions in this XAML file are well-formed and follow standard practices for a maintainable and scalable UI design.
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionEditor.cs (1)
24-24: Check the Necessity of the NewusingDirectiveThe addition of
using GingerCore;is necessary for accessingGingerCoreclasses used in the new logic for handling mock data expressions. Ensure that this new dependency is justified and that it does not introduce unnecessary coupling.Verification successful
The
using GingerCore;directive is necessary.The
GingerCorenamespace is used in multiple instances within theValueExpressionEditor.csfile, indicating that the new dependency is justified.
Tuple<GingerCore.ValueExpression.eFlowDetailsObjects, string> expParams = GingerCore.ValueExpression.GetFlowDetailsParams(txt);Mockdata expParams = GingerCore.ValueExpression.GetMockDataDatasetsFunction(txt);Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of GingerCore namespace in the file. # Test: Search for 'GingerCore' usage in the file. Expect: At least one instance. rg --type cs --count 'GingerCore' 'Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionEditor.cs'Length of output: 223
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the correct path for ValueExpressionEditor.cs fd ValueExpressionEditor.csLength of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of GingerCore namespace in the file. # Test: Search for 'GingerCore' usage in the file. Expect: At least one instance. rg --type cs 'GingerCore' 'Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionEditor.cs'Length of output: 430
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs (1)
85-89: Review ofGetLocalesmethodThis method is supposed to fetch locales but currently returns a hardcoded list from the
Bogus.Database. Ensure that this is the intended implementation or if it should fetch data dynamically from a service or database.
- Hardcoded Data: If the list of locales is subject to change or needs to be up-to-date with external standards, consider fetching this data from an external service or configuration file.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/RosLynLib/CodeProcessor.cs (1)
391-391: Change logging level from DEBUG to ERROR.The logging level for exceptions has been correctly updated to ERROR, which is appropriate for exception handling scenarios.
| public static Mockdata GetMockDataDatasetsFunction(string MockDataExpression) | ||
| { | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| string objStr = string.Empty; | ||
| string functions = string.Empty; | ||
| string Datasetobject = string.Empty; | ||
| string Locale = string.Empty; | ||
| int datasetStartindex = MockDataExpression.IndexOf('='); | ||
| int datasetendindex = MockDataExpression.IndexOf('('); | ||
| int localestartindex = MockDataExpression.IndexOf('"'); | ||
| int localeendindex = MockDataExpression.IndexOf(')'); | ||
| int functionstartindex = MockDataExpression.IndexOf('.'); | ||
| string funsubstring = MockDataExpression.Substring(functionstartindex + 1, MockDataExpression.Length - functionstartindex - 1); | ||
| int functionendindex = funsubstring.IndexOf('('); | ||
| Datasetobject = MockDataExpression.Substring(datasetStartindex + 1, datasetendindex - 1 - datasetStartindex); | ||
| Locale = MockDataExpression.Substring(localestartindex + 1, localeendindex - 2 - localestartindex); | ||
| objStr = MockDataExpression.Substring(datasetStartindex + 1, datasetendindex - 1 - datasetStartindex); | ||
| functions = funsubstring.Substring(0, functionendindex).Replace("\"", "").Trim(); | ||
| Mockdata mockdata = new (); | ||
| mockdata.MockDataDatasets = objStr; | ||
| mockdata.Locale = Locale; | ||
| mockdata.Function = functions; | ||
| mockdata.MockExpression = MockDataExpression; | ||
| return mockdata; | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, string.Format("Failed to evaluate flow details expression '{0}' due to wrong format", MockDataExpression)); | ||
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor parsing logic and enhance error handling in GetMockDataDatasetsFunction.
The current implementation uses manual string operations for parsing, which is error-prone and hard to maintain. Consider using regular expressions or a parsing library for more robust and error-resistant parsing.
Additionally, the error handling could be improved by providing more informative error messages and possibly throwing specific exceptions rather than returning null.
| public class Mockdata | ||
| { | ||
| public string MockDataDatasets { get; set; } | ||
|
|
||
| public string Locale { get; set; } | ||
|
|
||
| public string Function { get; set; } | ||
|
|
||
| public string MockExpression { get; set; } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider renaming properties in Mockdata class for clarity.
The properties of the Mockdata class could be renamed to follow C# naming conventions and provide more clarity. For example, MockDataDatasets could be renamed to Datasets to avoid redundancy.
- public string MockDataDatasets { get; set; }
+ public string Datasets { get; set; }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public class Mockdata | |
| { | |
| public string MockDataDatasets { get; set; } | |
| public string Locale { get; set; } | |
| public string Function { get; set; } | |
| public string MockExpression { get; set; } | |
| } | |
| public class Mockdata | |
| { | |
| public string Datasets { get; set; } | |
| public string Locale { get; set; } | |
| public string Function { get; set; } | |
| public string MockExpression { get; set; } | |
| } |
| if(txt.StartsWith("{MockDataExp Fun=")) | ||
| { | ||
| Mockdata expParams = GingerCore.ValueExpression.GetMockDataDatasetsFunction(txt); | ||
| if (expParams != null) | ||
| { | ||
| p = new ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage(mContext, SelectedContentArgs,expParams.MockDataDatasets, expParams.Function, expParams.Locale, expParams.MockExpression); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
New Logic to Handle {MockDataExp Fun= Expressions
The added logic to handle expressions starting with {MockDataExp Fun= is well-integrated within the GetPageFor method. This method now checks for the specific pattern and, if matched, uses GingerCore.ValueExpression.GetMockDataDatasetsFunction to parse the expression and create a new instance of ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.
- Correctness: The implementation correctly checks for null values before proceeding with the creation of the page, which prevents potential null reference exceptions.
- Performance: Ensure that the
GetMockDataDatasetsFunctionmethod is optimized for performance, especially if it involves complex parsing or external data fetching.
Overall, the implementation follows good practices, but it's recommended to add unit tests to cover these new scenarios to ensure stability and correctness.
Would you like me to help in writing unit tests for this new functionality?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@prashelke, here are the unit tests for the new functionality handling {MockDataExp Fun= expressions in the GetPageFor method. These tests will help ensure that the method behaves as expected under various scenarios:
using NUnit.Framework;
using Ginger.UserControlsLib.TextEditor.ValueExpression;
using GingerCoreNET.ValueExpressionLib;
using amdocs.ginger.GingerCoreNET;
using Amdocs.Ginger.Common;
namespace GingerCoreNETUnitTest.ValueExpressionTests
{
[TestFixture]
public class ValueExpressionEditorTests
{
private ValueExpressionEditor editor;
private Context context;
[SetUp]
public void Setup()
{
context = new Context();
editor = new ValueExpressionEditor(context);
}
[Test]
public void GetPageFor_ValidMockDataExp_ReturnsMockDataEditorPage()
{
// Arrange
string expression = "{MockDataExp Fun=ValidFunction}";
SelectedContentArgs args = new SelectedContentArgs { TextEditor = new MockTextEditor(expression) };
// Act
Page result = editor.GetPageFor(args);
// Assert
Assert.IsNotNull(result);
Assert.IsInstanceOf<ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage>(result);
}
[Test]
public void GetPageFor_InvalidMockDataExp_ReturnsNull()
{
// Arrange
string expression = "{MockDataExp Fun=}";
SelectedContentArgs args = new SelectedContentArgs { TextEditor = new MockTextEditor(expression) };
// Act
Page result = editor.GetPageFor(args);
// Assert
Assert.IsNull(result);
}
[Test]
public void GetPageFor_NullInput_ThrowsNoException()
{
// Arrange
SelectedContentArgs args = null;
// Act & Assert
Assert.DoesNotThrow(() => editor.GetPageFor(args));
}
}
// Mock implementation of TextEditor to simulate user input
public class MockTextEditor : ITextEditor
{
public string Text { get; set; }
public MockTextEditor(string text)
{
Text = text;
}
}
}These tests check for valid input, invalid input, and null input scenarios. Feel free to adjust the test cases or add more to cover additional cases you might be concerned about.
| else if(p.GetType() == typeof(ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage)) | ||
| { | ||
| ((ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage)p).UpdateContent(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update Method for ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage
The addition in the UpdateSelectedContent method to handle updates specifically for ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage instances is a good practice. It ensures that updates to the content of this page are handled separately, allowing for more specialized logic that might be necessary for mock data expressions.
- Maintainability: This separation of logic enhances maintainability by isolating the mock data expression handling.
- Error Handling: Consider adding more robust error handling within this block to manage potential exceptions that could arise during the update process.
Overall, the change is well-implemented, but enhancing error handling could improve robustness.
- ((ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage)p).UpdateContent();
+ try {
+ ((ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage)p).UpdateContent();
+ } catch (Exception e) {
+ // Handle exceptions appropriately
+ Logger.Error(e);
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| else if(p.GetType() == typeof(ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage)) | |
| { | |
| ((ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage)p).UpdateContent(); | |
| } | |
| else if(p.GetType() == typeof(ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage)) | |
| { | |
| try { | |
| ((ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage)p).UpdateContent(); | |
| } catch (Exception e) { | |
| // Handle exceptions appropriately | |
| Logger.Error(e); | |
| } | |
| } |
| public partial class ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage : Page | ||
| { | ||
| SelectedContentArgs mSelectedContentArgs; | ||
| Context mContext; | ||
| string mObj; | ||
| public ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage(Context context, SelectedContentArgs SelectedContentArgs, string obj, string function, string Locale, string MockExpression) | ||
| { | ||
| InitializeComponent(); | ||
| mContext = context; | ||
| mSelectedContentArgs = SelectedContentArgs; | ||
| mObj = obj; | ||
| int datasetStartindex = MockExpression.IndexOf('='); | ||
| int datasetendindex = MockExpression.IndexOf('('); | ||
| int localestartindex = MockExpression.IndexOf('"'); | ||
| int localeendindex = MockExpression.IndexOf(')'); | ||
| int functionstartindex = MockExpression.IndexOf('.'); | ||
|
|
||
| List<string> Localelst = GetLocales(); | ||
| Type objType; | ||
| List<string> objClasses = new List<string>(); | ||
| List<string> methodList = new List<string>(); | ||
|
|
||
| Assembly assembly = Assembly.Load("Bogus"); // or load your target assembly | ||
|
|
||
| string namespaceName = "Bogus.DataSets"; | ||
|
|
||
| objClasses = GetObjectClasses(assembly, namespaceName); | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| // Example of fetching locales (replace with actual implementation) | ||
| Localelst = GetLocales(); | ||
|
|
||
| string objTypeName = mObj.Equals("Randomizer") ? $"Bogus.{mObj}" : $"Bogus.DataSets.{mObj}"; | ||
| objType = assembly.GetType(objTypeName); | ||
|
|
||
| methodList = GetMethodsOfType(objType); | ||
| int CaretPossition = SelectedContentArgs.GetCaretPosition(); | ||
| if ((datasetStartindex < CaretPossition) && (CaretPossition < datasetendindex)) | ||
| { | ||
| FunctionsList.ItemsSource = objClasses.OrderBy(x => x).ToList(); | ||
| } | ||
| else if ((localestartindex < CaretPossition) && (CaretPossition < localeendindex) && (!mObj.Equals("Randomizer") || !mObj.Equals("Finance"))) | ||
| { | ||
| FunctionsList.ItemsSource = Localelst.OrderBy(x => x).ToList(); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| FunctionsList.ItemsSource = methodList.OrderBy(x => x).ToList(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage constructor
The constructor initializes the page and sets up the data context based on the provided mock expression. It dynamically loads types and methods, which could lead to performance considerations if not cached properly.
- Performance Concern: Dynamically loading assemblies and types (
Assembly.Load("Bogus")andassembly.GetType(objTypeName)) can be costly. Consider caching these if they are used frequently throughout the application. - Error Handling: There is no error handling for the dynamic type loading. If the types or methods are not found, this could lead to runtime exceptions.
- Data Validation: The parsing of
MockExpressionto determine indexes is brittle and may fail if the format is not strictly adhered to. Consider using a more robust parsing strategy or regular expressions with proper error handling.
| private static List<string> GetObjectClasses(Assembly assembly, string namespaceName) | ||
| { | ||
| Type[] types = assembly.GetTypes(); | ||
| List<string> objclass = types.Where(t => t.Namespace == namespaceName && typeof(DataSet).IsAssignableFrom(t) && t != typeof(DataSet) && t.FullName.Contains(namespaceName)) | ||
| .Select(x => x.Name) | ||
| .ToList(); | ||
| objclass.Add("Randomizer"); | ||
| return objclass; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of GetObjectClasses method
This method fetches classes from the Bogus.DataSets namespace that are assignable from DataSet. It's a good use of reflection for dynamic type discovery.
- Performance Optimization: Consider caching the result of
assembly.GetTypes()if this method is called frequently. - Error Handling: Add error handling for type loading and filtering to prevent runtime exceptions if the assembly or types are not available.
| private static List<string> GetMethodsOfType(Type objType) | ||
| { | ||
| List<string> methodList = new List<string>(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (objType != null) | ||
| { | ||
| MethodInfo[] methods = objType.GetMethods(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.DeclaredOnly); | ||
|
|
||
| if (methods != null) | ||
| { | ||
| var excludedMethods = GetExcludedMethods(objType.ToString()); | ||
| var groupedMethods = methods.GroupBy(m => m.Name); | ||
| foreach (var methodGroup in groupedMethods) | ||
| { | ||
| foreach (MethodInfo method in methodGroup) | ||
| { | ||
| if (excludedMethods.Contains(method.Name)) | ||
| { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| string parameters = string.Join(", ", method.GetParameters().Select(p => FormatParameter(p))); | ||
|
|
||
| string functionString = $"{method.Name}({parameters})"; | ||
| methodList.Add(functionString); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return methodList; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of GetMethodsOfType method
This method dynamically fetches and formats methods of a given type. It excludes certain methods based on the type.
- Complexity and Maintainability: The method is complex and does multiple things: fetching methods, filtering them, and formatting. Consider breaking this method into smaller, more focused methods.
- Error Handling: There is no handling for null
objType, which could lead toNullReferenceExceptionat runtime.
| private static object SetDefaultValue(ParameterInfo parameter) | ||
| { | ||
| Type parameterType = parameter.ParameterType; | ||
| TimeOnly defaultSartTime = TimeOnly.MaxValue; | ||
| if (parameterType == typeof(DateTime) && parameter.Name.Equals("start")) | ||
| { | ||
| return "Past(1)"; | ||
| } | ||
| else if (parameterType == typeof(DateTime) && parameter.Name.Equals("end")) | ||
| { | ||
| return "Future(1)"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (parameterType == typeof(DateOnly) && parameter.Name.Equals("start")) | ||
| { | ||
| return "PastDateOnly(1)"; | ||
| } | ||
| else if (parameterType == typeof(DateOnly) && parameter.Name.Equals("end")) | ||
| { | ||
| return "FutureDateOnly(1)"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (parameterType == typeof(DateTimeOffset) && parameter.Name.Equals("start")) | ||
| { | ||
| return "PastOffset(1)"; | ||
| } | ||
| else if (parameterType == typeof(DateTimeOffset) && parameter.Name.Equals("end")) | ||
| { | ||
| return "FutureOffset(1)"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if(parameterType == typeof(Array)) | ||
| { | ||
| return "[1,2,3,4]"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (parameterType == typeof(List<int>)) | ||
| { | ||
| return "[1,2,3,4,5]"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (parameterType == typeof(string)) | ||
| { | ||
| if(parameter.Name.Equals("format")) | ||
| { | ||
| return "'12#34'"; | ||
| } | ||
| else if (parameter.Name.Equals("symbol")) | ||
| { | ||
| return "'#'"; | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| return "'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ'"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
| //DateTimeOffset | ||
| return GetDefaultForType(parameterType); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of SetDefaultValue method
This method sets default values for parameters based on their type and name. It uses a large series of conditional checks which could be simplified.
- Refactoring Suggestion: Use a dictionary or a strategy pattern to map types and names to default values to simplify the method and improve maintainability.
- Potential Bug: The method returns a string representation of default values, which might not be compatible with all expected types (e.g., returning a string for a
DateTimeparameter).
| public void UpdateContent() | ||
| { | ||
|
|
||
| string selectedItem = (string)FunctionsList.SelectedItem; | ||
| string initialText = mSelectedContentArgs.TextEditor.Text.Substring(0, mSelectedContentArgs.StartPos); | ||
|
|
||
| // Parsing the text editor content | ||
| string editorText = mSelectedContentArgs.TextEditor.Text; | ||
| int datasetStartIndex = editorText.IndexOf('='); | ||
| int datasetEndIndex = editorText.IndexOf('('); | ||
| int localeStartIndex = editorText.IndexOf('"'); | ||
| int localeEndIndex = editorText.IndexOf(')'); | ||
| int functionStartIndex = editorText.IndexOf('.'); | ||
|
|
||
| string functionSubstring = editorText.Substring(functionStartIndex + 1); | ||
| int functionEndIndex = functionSubstring.IndexOf('('); | ||
|
|
||
| string datasetObject = ExtractSubstring(editorText, datasetStartIndex + 1, datasetEndIndex - datasetStartIndex - 1); | ||
| string locale = ExtractSubstring(editorText, localeStartIndex + 1, localeEndIndex - localeStartIndex - 2); | ||
| string objStr = ExtractSubstring(editorText, datasetStartIndex + 1, datasetEndIndex - datasetStartIndex - 1); | ||
| string functions = functionSubstring.Substring(0, functionEndIndex).Replace("\"", "").Trim(); | ||
|
|
||
| int caretPosition = mSelectedContentArgs.GetCaretPosition(); | ||
| string resultText = BuildResultText(selectedItem, objStr, locale, functions, caretPosition, datasetStartIndex, datasetEndIndex, localeStartIndex, localeEndIndex); | ||
|
|
||
| // Append the remaining text and update the text editor content | ||
| resultText += editorText.Substring(mSelectedContentArgs.EndPos + 1); | ||
| mSelectedContentArgs.TextEditor.Text = resultText; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of UpdateContent method
This method updates the content of a text editor based on the selected item in a list. It parses the editor's text to replace parts of the mock data expression.
- Error Handling and Validation: The method assumes the structure of the text is always correct. It should include error handling for parsing and updating operations to avoid runtime errors.
- Performance: Consider optimizing string operations, as multiple substring and replace operations can be costly, especially with large texts.
| if (expressionlist[1].Contains("BetweenTimeOnly")) | ||
| { | ||
| expressionlist[1] = expressionlist[1].Replace(Parameter[0], $"TimeOnly.FromDateTime(Result.{Parameter[0]})").Replace(Parameter[1], $"TimeOnly.FromDateTime(Result.{Parameter[1]})"); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| expressionlist[1] = expressionlist[1].Replace(Parameter[0], $"Result.{Parameter[0]}").Replace(Parameter[1], $"Result.{Parameter[1]}"); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor to improve readability and maintainability of conditional logic.
The conditional logic within the GetBogusExpressionEvaluteResult method is complex and hard to maintain due to nested conditions and string manipulations. Consider refactoring to separate concerns and improve readability.
- if (expressionlist[1].Contains("BetweenTimeOnly"))
- {
- expressionlist[1] = expressionlist[1].Replace(Parameter[0], $"TimeOnly.FromDateTime(Result.{Parameter[0]})").Replace(Parameter[1], $"TimeOnly.FromDateTime(Result.{Parameter[1]})");
- }
- else
- {
- expressionlist[1] = expressionlist[1].Replace(Parameter[0], $"Result.{Parameter[0]}").Replace(Parameter[1], $"Result.{Parameter[1]}");
- }
+ // Refactor to a method to handle parameter replacement
+ expressionlist[1] = ReplaceParameters(expressionlist[1], Parameter);Consider extracting the parameter replacement logic into a separate method to handle different scenarios based on the expression content. This will make the code easier to test and maintain.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
.../Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionEditor.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionEditor.cs (3 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ValueExpressionLib/ValueExpression.cs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionEditor.cs
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ValueExpressionLib/ValueExpression.cs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ValueExpressionLib/ValueExpression.cs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/ValueExpression/ValueExpressionMockDataEditorPage.xaml.cs
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ValueExpressionLib/ValueExpression.cs
Maheshkale447
merged commit 38ac468
into
Releases/Official-Release
Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Improvements