Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 6, 2024. It is now read-only.

2020 11 19

Nathaniel Starkman (@nstarman) edited this page Nov 20, 2020 · 2 revisions

Meeting November 19, 2020

Recap

  • Ask Jo

    • about JupyterHub on his server
    • Spherical Harmonic Expansion
    • Numerical methods for going to a DF from a non-axisymmetric, analytic potential / density
  • Upload Mathematica Derivation as PR (@CCAstro35)

    • Create branch
    • put derivation in branch
    • publish branch to github
    • create Pull request & request @nstarman review

Meeting Notes

@CCAstro35 showing Residual Grid in AGAMA

@nstarman showed the relative merits of different fit statistics. One statistic that needs further consideration is the RMS.

Sampling lattice discussion: the difficulties of how to lay down a lattice where the points are determined by the density of the potential.

We are now working on creating a coherent code framework to do the sampling.

Our residual function is wrong. We should be looking at the differential of the potential, not the potential itself.

@nstarman talked to Jeremy Webb about lattices. We are looking for an Adaptive Mesh Refinement code. This is a list of related links:

@nstarman talked to Jo about Lattices. Suggest Voronoi tesselations and Barnes-Hut tree. Also, as a good ab initio, just lay down a cylindrical mesh for the disc. Alternatively, lay down a fine mesh using the most-applicable symmetry and weight each lattice point by the potential / density / gradient thereof.

So, lattice options, ranked in increasing complexity:

  1. just lay down a mesh
  2. weight each point in the mesh by the potential / density / gradient thereof
  3. adapt the mesh

For Next Week

  • Continue clean everything. (@nstarman)

    • Continue PRs for project configuration
    • Make some Plots of the the DFs in the notebook
  • Poisson Noise for Hernquist Spheres

    • Sample Galpy (@nstarman)
    • Sample AGAMA (@CCAstro35)
  • consider the RMS statistic