-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
Heavy Neutral Lepton simulation
John Plows edited this page Aug 30, 2022
·
7 revisions
Komninos-John Plows
v3.4.0?
Develop a complete simulation of long-lived Heavy Neutral Leptons (HNL) in GENIE.
- Codes for calculating HNL fluxes, based on a standardised output for neutrino beamline simulations (dk2nu)
- Codes for simulating the propagation and decay of HNL to configurable final states
- A specialised HNL event generation app with hooks for detector geometry and flux descriptions
- User-input flux description
- Flux in histograms
- Flux in tuples (dk2nu-like)
- Other flux formats?
- User-input ROOT geometry (other formats? gdml, for instance?)
- User-input flux description
- A new section for the Non-Neutrino Event Generation Modes of the GENIE Physics and User Manual
- Implementation and validation of HNL flux generation routines
- Validation of ROOT geometry routines with custom transformation between “beam” and “detector” frames
- Implementation of polarisation
HNL generation package is standalone - just enable it in configure
and go.
- Framework consolidation - pass as many physics variables (such as HNL parameter space & Dirac vs Majorana nature) to user, allow user-input detector geometry, user input fluxes
- POT counting:
maps N(HNL events in channel) |--> N'(exp. POT delivered)
writes weight = POT expected for event - Flux generation - implementation of dk2nu ==> flux
- Currently flux prediction requires dk2nu ==> flat ROOT trees ==> flux
- HNL polarisation effects with hook for switching on or off (user may have unpolarised HNL beam)
- Majorana HNL implementation
- Polarisation effect inclusion for two- and three- body decays of HNL.
- Heavy HNL - this is going to need a custom flux calculation for heavy particles such as Ds that can decay into HNL with M > m_K+. These are important for probing channels that contain tau in final state
- Multiple Lagrangians and their associated decay widths. TBD.
- Multi-HNL hypothesis - see the relevant paper
- Test POT map with wide selection of couplings / ROOT geometry files / volumes
- Ensure output matches analytical calculation for “particle-gun”-like HNL (user-input energy + momentum direction)
- Ensure match for specific flux inputs (i.e. sampled energy + momentum)
- Flux prediction should be understood / (match literature if using same dk2nu flux files?) - do we want to ask theorists for input?
- Energy spectrum weighted for HNL collimation efffect <==> acceptance increase
- Production point
- User <–> beam transformation
- HNL production rates per parent
- Validate HNL decay rates match literature, (& that polarisation effects are taken into account correctly depending on user hook)
- Make sure HNL final state kinematics are sensible for different channels
- Validate geometry integration for decay-in-flight weight calculation
- Contribution to the GENIE User and Physics manual
-
N/A
https://genie-docdb.pp.rl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/private/ShowDocument?docid=295
P. Coloma et al, EPJ C 81 (2021) 78
P. Ballett et al, JHEP 2020 (2020) 111
J.-M. Levy, 1805.06419 A. de Gouvea et al, Phys. Rev. D (2022) 105
J.-L. Tastet et al, JHEP 2021 (2021) 182
Other relevant documents:
- HNL search at T2K, K. Abe et al, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 052006