kernel-module-isp-vvcam: prevent build warning #1976
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The way the kernel-module-isp-vvcam Makefiles are written, each kernel module gets its own Module.symvers created in its own sub directory. The only kernel module actually having a symbol exported is vvcam-dwe. Thus point MODULES_MODULE_SYMVERS_LOCATION to that location. Prevents: | WARNING: kernel-module-isp-vvcam-4.2.2.24.1-r0 do_install: Module.symvers not found in .../kernel-module-isp-vvcam/4.2.2.24.1/git/vvcam/v4l2/ | WARNING: kernel-module-isp-vvcam-4.2.2.24.1-r0 do_install: Please consider setting MODULES_MODULE_SYMVERS_LOCATION to a | WARNING: kernel-module-isp-vvcam-4.2.2.24.1-r0 do_install: directory below B to get correct inter-module dependencies Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher <[email protected]>
|
Successfully created backport PR #1977 for |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I see this also on scarthgap so I propose if it is accepted to also backport to scarthgap.