Skip to content

Conversation

DayTF
Copy link
Contributor

@DayTF DayTF commented Oct 3, 2025

Definition of Done

task: CU-86c5ucmr0

General

  • Write an explicit title for the Pull Request, following Conventional Commits specification
  • Test manually the implemented changes
  • Validate the code quality (indentation, syntax, style, simplicity, readability)

Security

  • Consider the security impact of the changes made

Copy link

qltysh bot commented Oct 3, 2025

All good ✅
This is from Qlty Cloud, the successor to Code Climate Quality. Learn more.

Copy link

qltysh bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Diff Coverage: The code coverage on the diff in this pull request is 71.2%.

Total Coverage: This PR will decrease coverage by 0.24%.

File Coverage Changes
Path File Coverage Δ Indirect
packages/forest_admin_datasource_rpc/lib/forest_admin_datasource_rpc/Utils/sse_client.rb 0.8
packages/forest_admin_rpc_agent/lib/forest_admin_rpc_agent/routes/sse.rb -29.3
🛟 Help
  • Diff Coverage: Coverage for added or modified lines of code (excludes deleted files). Learn more.

  • Total Coverage: Coverage for the whole repository, calculated as the sum of all File Coverage. Learn more.

  • File Coverage: Covered Lines divided by Covered Lines plus Missed Lines. (Excludes non-executable lines including blank lines and comments.)

    • Indirect Changes: Changes to File Coverage for files that were not modified in this PR. Learn more.

This is from Qlty Cloud, the successor to Code Climate Quality. Learn more.

@matthv matthv force-pushed the feat/sse-improve-error-connection-handling branch from 998089f to 74aecb3 Compare October 6, 2025 09:34
@matthv matthv force-pushed the feat/sse-improve-error-connection-handling branch from 74aecb3 to 4bdaf3d Compare October 6, 2025 14:00
@matthv matthv force-pushed the feat/sse-improve-error-connection-handling branch from 2d8c687 to d9fdee2 Compare October 8, 2025 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants