Skip to content

[NoQA] enforce accessibility rules in AI reviewer#85083

Open
rushatgabhane wants to merge 6 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
rushatgabhane:a11y-ai
Open

[NoQA] enforce accessibility rules in AI reviewer#85083
rushatgabhane wants to merge 6 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
rushatgabhane:a11y-ai

Conversation

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane commented Mar 12, 2026

Explanation of Change

Note: I used claude to generate this PR

Tested here

Added 12 accessibility review rules

Rules enforce WCAG 2.2 AA compliance for React Native, covering: accessible labels, semantic roles, state communication, touch target sizes, dynamic content announcements, image accessibility, color-only information, modal focus management, drag alternatives, text scaling, form accessibility, and logical focus order

Fixed Issues

$ #85082
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2026 13:49
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from QichenZhu and removed request for a team March 12, 2026 13:50
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 12, 2026

@QichenZhu Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane removed the request for review from QichenZhu March 12, 2026 14:07
@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member Author

Tested here. It caught real issues and didn't have false positives

Copy link
Contributor

@kacper-mikolajczak kacper-mikolajczak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for the effort @rushatgabhane put into improving a11y!

I've got couple of questions and I'd love to know your insight.

Comment on lines +6 to +10
## [A11Y-1] Interactive elements must have accessible labels

### Reasoning

Screen readers (VoiceOver/TalkBack) cannot convey the purpose of an interactive element without a text label. Icon-only buttons, image-only touchables, and components whose visible text is insufficient for context must provide `accessibilityLabel`. Without it, assistive technology announces the element as an unnamed control, making the app unusable for screen reader users. (WCAG 1.1.1, 4.1.2)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following the general priority of "static linting first, ai reviewer last" - looks like this rule might overlap with react-native-a11y/has-valid-accessibility-descriptors we have enabled.

Maybe we could narrow it down, so there are no redundant violations coming both from eslint and reviewer. Thanks!

Comment on lines +32 to +35
<Pressable
accessibilityRole="button"
onPress={handleSubmit}
>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Examples use accessibilityRole, but since RN 0.73+ the role prop is the preferred cross-platform equivalent.

Btw, how this one overlaps with react-native-a11y/has-accessibility-props?

Comment on lines +6 to +10
## [A11Y-10] Respect user text scaling preferences

### Reasoning

Users with low vision rely on system-level font size settings (iOS Dynamic Type / Android Font Size) to enlarge text. Setting `allowFontScaling={false}` or `maxFontSizeMultiplier={1}` disables this, making text unreadable for these users. Layouts must accommodate scaled text using flexible containers (`minHeight`, `flexWrap`) instead of fixed pixel heights. (WCAG 1.4.4)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we could restrict usage of allowFontScaling={false} or maxFontSizeMultiplier={1} via linter instead of adding new rule. What do you think?

Comment on lines +6 to +10
## [A11Y-11] Forms must have accessible labels, errors, and instructions

### Reasoning

Screen reader users navigate forms field by field. Each input must be associated with a descriptive label so users know what to enter. While React Native uses `placeholder` as a fallback accessible name, it disappears once the user starts typing, leaving the field unlabeled. An explicit `accessibilityLabel` (or `accessibilityLabelledBy` on Android) persists regardless of input state. Error messages must be announced when they appear using `accessibilityLiveRegion` (Android) and `AccessibilityInfo.announceForAccessibility()` (iOS). (WCAG 1.3.1, 3.3.1, 3.3.2)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In ideal scenario, we'd enforce those kind of a11y requirements via component design system which serves as build blocks for most of UI like forms. This would be better in terms of other angles, not just pure a11y. What do you think is needed to be achieved in our app?

Comment on lines +15 to +22
// Disabled button — screen reader doesn't know it's disabled
<Pressable
onPress={onSubmit}
style={isDisabled && styles.disabled}
disabled={isDisabled}
>
<Text>Submit</Text>
</Pressable>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't props like disabled directly internally linked to a11y state and setting both would be redundant?

Comment on lines +6 to +15
## [A11Y-8] Manage focus for modals and overlays

### Reasoning

When a modal, bottom sheet, or popover opens, screen reader users can still navigate to content behind it unless focus is trapped inside the overlay. Platform-specific handling is required:

- **iOS/Web**: Use `accessibilityViewIsModal={true}` on the modal container — VoiceOver ignores sibling views, and React Native Web maps it to `aria-modal`.
- **Android**: Use `importantForAccessibility="no-hide-descendants"` on the background content to hide it from TalkBack.

Focus should move to the modal's first interactive element on open and return to the trigger on close. (WCAG 2.4.3, 2.1.2)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This, similar to forms remark, I think would be best to be resolved on design system level (either implicitly or enforcing correct props).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants