Replace stk::mesh::Part* with stk::mesh::PartVector&. Issue #1183 #1185
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PartVectors allow for the specification of a field on a list of parts instead of one part at a time. For some classes it was only possible to pass a single part pointer for the field specification where a part vector would be more flexible.
Started with register_nodal_fields:
from: register_nodal_fields(stk::mesh::Part* part)
to: register_nodal_fields(const stk::mesh::PartVector &part_vec)
The stk::mesh::put_field_on_mesh function does not take a PartVector so create a Selector form a PartVector:
stk::mesh::Selector selector = stk::mesh::selectUnion(part_vec);
and use that instead. There were a couple of places where the construction of a PartVector from a single Part pointer:
PartVector(1,Part*)
was useful.
There were a lot of files changed, but the changes are trivial.