Update FatesColdAllVars history output
#3058
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
glemieux
added
FATES
glemieux
changed the title
FatesColdAllVars history ouptuFatesColdAllVars history output
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
This PR updates the
fincl1list of nominally inactive FATES history output with recent additions to theFatesColdAllVarshistory output. Resolves #3052.Specific notes
This should be integrated after NGEET/fates#1338 has been merged into FATES
mainand the ctsm tag has been updated to a fates tag that is associated with said PR (or newer).Contributors other than yourself, if any:
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #): #3052
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)?
FIELDLISTdiffs only forFatesColdAllVarsAny User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No
Testing performed, if any:
(List what testing you did to show your changes worked as expected)
(This can be manual testing or running of the different test suites)
(Documentation on system testing is here: https://github.com/ESCOMP/ctsm/wiki/System-Testing-Guide)
(aux_clm on derecho for intel/gnu and izumi for intel/gnu/nag/nvhpc is the standard for tags on master)
NOTE: Be sure to check your coding style against the standard
(https://github.com/ESCOMP/ctsm/wiki/CTSM-coding-guidelines) and review
the list of common problems to watch out for
(https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/wiki/List-of-common-problems).