{2023.06}[2022b,a64fx] apps originally built with EB 4.9.0 #1187

hvelab · 2025-09-09T12:07:38Z

Based on #1013

hvelab · 2025-09-09T12:08:25Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

gpu-bot-ugent · 2025-09-09T12:08:31Z

Label bot:build has been set by user hvelab, but this person does not have permission to trigger builds

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-09T12:08:40Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1187/542005

date	job status	comment
Sep 09 12:08:38 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `542005` awaits release by job manager
Sep 09 12:09:00 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 09 12:10:04 UTC 2025	running	job `542005` is running
Sep 09 13:10:16 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-542005.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17574230200.tar.gz` size: 21 MiB (22058757 bytes) entries: 899 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all `Bison/3.8.2-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `ICU/72.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Ninja/1.11.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `PCRE2/10.40-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software `Bison/3.8.2-GCCcore-12.2.0` `ICU/72.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Ninja/1.11.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `PCRE2/10.40-GCCcore-12.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Sep 09 13:10:16 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 583.04 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 581.176 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.69 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.73 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8863.55 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8502.57 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-542005.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

removing Harfbuzz as it depends on rust

hvelab · 2025-09-09T15:07:19Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

gpu-bot-ugent · 2025-09-09T15:07:24Z

Label bot:build has been set by user hvelab, but this person does not have permission to trigger builds

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-09T15:07:28Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1187/542189

date	job status	comment
Sep 09 15:07:27 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `542189` awaits release by job manager
Sep 09 15:08:04 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 09 15:09:07 UTC 2025	running	job `542189` is running
Sep 09 16:10:02 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-542189.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17574338440.tar.gz` size: 4 MiB (4782424 bytes) entries: 183 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all `Highway/1.0.3-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Ninja/1.11.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `googletest/1.12.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software `Highway/1.0.3-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Ninja/1.11.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `googletest/1.12.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Sep 09 16:10:02 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 583.459 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 582.273 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.71 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.71 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8792.42 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8739.6 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-542189.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

bedroge · 2025-09-25T14:31:47Z

Previous attempts failed due to the Rust issue, which has been solved now. Let's try again.

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-25T14:31:57Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1187/554969

date	job status	comment
Sep 25 14:31:55 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `554969` awaits release by job manager
Sep 25 14:32:52 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 25 14:33:55 UTC 2025	running	job `554969` is running
Sep 25 15:48:00 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-554969.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17588148890.tar.gz` size: 5 MiB (5269771 bytes) entries: 1288 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all `Catch2/2.13.9-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Eigen/3.4.0-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Highway/1.0.3-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `gfbf/2022b.lua` `googletest/1.12.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `hypothesis/6.68.2-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `pybind11/2.10.3-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software `Catch2/2.13.9-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Eigen/3.4.0-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Highway/1.0.3-GCCcore-12.2.0` `gfbf/2022b` `googletest/1.12.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `hypothesis/6.68.2-GCCcore-12.2.0` `pybind11/2.10.3-GCCcore-12.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Sep 25 15:48:00 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 583.052 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 583.986 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.69 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.71 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8794.49 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8525.9 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-554969.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

bedroge · 2025-09-25T17:49:13Z

These numpy tests failed:

FAILED core/tests/test_deprecations.py::TestQuantileInterpolationDeprecation::test_deprecated[percentile]
FAILED core/tests/test_deprecations.py::TestQuantileInterpolationDeprecation::test_deprecated[nanpercentile]
FAILED core/tests/test_numeric.py::TestFloatExceptions::test_warnings - Asser...
FAILED lib/tests/test_function_base.py::TestCorrCoef::test_extreme - Floating...
FAILED lib/tests/test_nanfunctions.py::TestNanFunctions_Percentile::test_empty
FAILED polynomial/tests/test_classes.py::test_bad_conditioned_fit[Polynomial]
FAILED polynomial/tests/test_classes.py::test_bad_conditioned_fit[Legendre]
FAILED polynomial/tests/test_classes.py::test_bad_conditioned_fit[Chebyshev]
FAILED polynomial/tests/test_classes.py::test_bad_conditioned_fit[Laguerre]
FAILED polynomial/tests/test_classes.py::test_bad_conditioned_fit[Hermite] - ...
FAILED polynomial/tests/test_classes.py::test_bad_conditioned_fit[HermiteE]
= 11 failed, 25364 passed, 222 skipped, 1307 deselected, 33 xfailed, 4 xpassed, 775 warnings in 948.84s (0:15:48) =

boegel · 2025-09-26T05:38:48Z

@bedroge I would just log that as a known issue, see also #318

Note that we also have some magic in our hooks to help with getting fewer numpy test failures on neoverse_v1 (we use -march=armv8.4-a instead of -march=native), see:

{2023.06}[2022b] SciPy-bundle v2023.02 #448

bedroge · 2025-09-26T10:06:12Z

@bedroge I would just log that as a known issue, see also #318

Note that we also have some magic in our hooks to help with getting fewer numpy test failures on neoverse_v1 (we use -march=armv8.4-a instead of -march=native), see:

{2023.06}[2022b] SciPy-bundle v2023.02 #448

I just tried it interactively with -march=armv8.2-a (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujitsu_A64FX and https://www.fujitsu.com/global/products/computing/servers/supercomputer/a64fx/), and then numpy installs without issues. I guess the culprit may be sve, as that's probably disabled with armv8.2-a. Now retrying with armv8.2-a+sve.

bedroge · 2025-09-26T11:48:12Z

Confirmed: with armv8.2-a+sve the same 11 tests fail. So we can either ignore the failing tests or build without sve support.

edit: maybe I should try SciPy itself as well with both approaches.

Scipy built with --optarch="march=armv8.2-a" has two failing tests:

FAILED ../../optimize/tests/test_linprog.py::TestLinprogIPSparse::test_bug_6139 - AssertionError: linprog status 4, message: The solution does not satisfy the constraints within the...
FAILED ../../optimize/tests/test_linprog.py::TestLinprogIPSparsePresolve::test_bug_6139 - AssertionError: linprog status 4, message: The solution does not satisfy the constraints wi...

hvelab · 2025-09-29T10:02:02Z

I will split this PR into two, I'll move the SciPy bundle so I it's cleaner with the hook modification, and the rest of the apps will remain in this one

remove scipy to split it into another PR

hvelab · 2025-09-29T10:03:39Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

gpu-bot-ugent · 2025-09-29T10:03:43Z

Label bot:build has been set by user hvelab, but this person does not have permission to trigger builds

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-29T10:03:45Z

error: easystacks/software.eessi.io/2023.06/a64fx/eessi-2023.06-eb-4.9.4-2022b.yml: patch does not apply

Unable to download or merge changes between the source branch and the destination branch.
Tip: This can usually be resolved by syncing your branch and resolving any merge conflicts.

hvelab · 2025-09-29T10:08:58Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

gpu-bot-ugent · 2025-09-29T10:09:04Z

Label bot:build has been set by user hvelab, but this person does not have permission to trigger builds

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-29T10:09:07Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1187/563649

date	job status	comment
Sep 29 10:09:06 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `563649` awaits release by job manager
Sep 29 10:09:31 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 29 10:10:34 UTC 2025	running	job `563649` is running
Sep 29 13:48:07 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-563649.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17591533170.tar.gz` size: 80 MiB (84011637 bytes) entries: 21567 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all `Armadillo/11.4.3-foss-2022b.lua` `Boost/1.81.0-GCC-12.2.0.lua` `CFITSIO/4.2.0-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Catch2/2.13.9-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Eigen/3.4.0-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `GEOS/3.11.1-GCC-12.2.0.lua` `HDF/4.2.15-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `HDF5/1.14.0-gompi-2022b.lua` `Highway/1.0.3-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `LibTIFF/4.4.0-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `PCRE/8.45-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `PROJ/9.1.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Szip/2.1.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `arpack-ng/3.8.0-foss-2022b.lua` `gfbf/2022b.lua` `giflib/5.2.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `googletest/1.12.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `gzip/1.12-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `hypothesis/6.68.2-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `jbigkit/2.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `libdeflate/1.15-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `libgeotiff/1.7.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `libtirpc/1.3.3-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `lz4/1.9.4-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `netCDF/4.9.0-gompi-2022b.lua` `nlohmann_json/3.11.2-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `pybind11/2.10.3-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `zstd/1.5.2-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software `Armadillo/11.4.3-foss-2022b` `Boost/1.81.0-GCC-12.2.0` `CFITSIO/4.2.0-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Catch2/2.13.9-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Eigen/3.4.0-GCCcore-12.2.0` `GEOS/3.11.1-GCC-12.2.0` `HDF/4.2.15-GCCcore-12.2.0` `HDF5/1.14.0-gompi-2022b` `Highway/1.0.3-GCCcore-12.2.0` `LibTIFF/4.4.0-GCCcore-12.2.0` `PCRE/8.45-GCCcore-12.2.0` `PROJ/9.1.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Szip/2.1.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `arpack-ng/3.8.0-foss-2022b` `gfbf/2022b` `giflib/5.2.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `googletest/1.12.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `gzip/1.12-GCCcore-12.2.0` `hypothesis/6.68.2-GCCcore-12.2.0` `jbigkit/2.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `libdeflate/1.15-GCCcore-12.2.0` `libgeotiff/1.7.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `libtirpc/1.3.3-GCCcore-12.2.0` `lz4/1.9.4-GCCcore-12.2.0` `netCDF/4.9.0-gompi-2022b` `nlohmann_json/3.11.2-GCCcore-12.2.0` `pybind11/2.10.3-GCCcore-12.2.0` `zstd/1.5.2-GCCcore-12.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Sep 29 13:48:07 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 580.665 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 564.163 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.64 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.72 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8754.18 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8734.54 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-563649.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

bedroge · 2025-09-30T18:08:10Z

Confirmed: with armv8.2-a+sve the same 11 tests fail. So we can either ignore the failing tests or build without sve support.

edit: maybe I should try SciPy itself as well with both approaches.

Scipy built with --optarch="march=armv8.2-a" has two failing tests:
FAILED ../../optimize/tests/test_linprog.py::TestLinprogIPSparse::test_bug_6139 - AssertionError: linprog status 4, message: The solution does not satisfy the constraints within the...
FAILED ../../optimize/tests/test_linprog.py::TestLinprogIPSparsePresolve::test_bug_6139 - AssertionError: linprog status 4, message: The solution does not satisfy the constraints wi...

Also tried this with --ignore-test-failure to check how many SciPy tests would fail for an optimized build:

3282 failed, 44531 passed, 2343 skipped, 139 xfailed, 11 xpassed, 61
errors in 4431.68s (1:13:51)

😲 So I think we should proceed with the less optimized version 😆

easystacks/software.eessi.io/2023.06/a64fx/eessi-2023.06-eb-4.9.4-2022b.yml

bedroge · 2025-10-04T12:07:59Z

I think this one has some overlap with #1177 (edit: and #1218), so let's do that one first.

adding easystack file

2e19a77

Update eessi-2023.06-eb-4.9.4-2022b.yml

859a142

removing Harfbuzz as it depends on rust

Merge branch 'main' into a64fx-eb-490

cbd9898

hvelab mentioned this pull request Sep 29, 2025

Notes on building the stack for Fujitsu A64FX #1024

Open

2 tasks

Update eessi-2023.06-eb-4.9.4-2022b.yml

afb0657

remove scipy to split it into another PR

Merge branch 'main' into a64fx-eb-490

1e7fc45

bedroge mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2025

Hooks for failing SciPy-Bundle 2023.02 tests on A64FX EESSI/software-layer-scripts#100

Merged

bedroge reviewed Oct 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

easystacks/software.eessi.io/2023.06/a64fx/eessi-2023.06-eb-4.9.4-2022b.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

enable SciPy-bundle build

0a2854e

bedroge mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2025

{2023.06}[2022b,a64fx] SciPy-bundle 2023.02 and Highway 1.0.3 #1217

Merged

{2023.06}[2022b,a64fx] apps originally built with EB 4.9.0 #1187

Are you sure you want to change the base?

{2023.06}[2022b,a64fx] apps originally built with EB 4.9.0 #1187

Uh oh!

Conversation

hvelab commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

gpu-bot-ugent bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 9, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

gpu-bot-ugent bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 9, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 25, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 25, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 26, 2025

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 26, 2025

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 26, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

gpu-bot-ugent bot commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

gpu-bot-ugent bot commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 30, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Oct 4, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

bedroge commented Sep 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

bedroge commented Oct 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading