{2023.06}[2022b,a64fx] Qt5 5.15.7, QuantumESPRESSO 7.2 #1177

agimenog · 2025-09-04T15:49:31Z

agimenog · 2025-09-04T15:51:19Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-04T15:51:28Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1177/534565

date	job status	comment
Sep 04 15:51:27 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `534565` awaits release by job manager
Sep 04 15:52:05 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 04 15:53:10 UTC 2025	running	job `534565` is running
Sep 04 16:02:48 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-534565.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17570014330.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (45 bytes) entries: 0 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Sep 04 16:02:48 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 582.517 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 583.396 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.66 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.72 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8289.6 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8711.51 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-534565.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

boegel · 2025-09-08T07:57:56Z

@agimenog Last build didn't work out as hoped?

agimenog · 2025-09-08T09:44:13Z

@boegel It seems so, I will check the logs to see where the problem is

agimenog · 2025-09-18T12:30:50Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-18T12:30:59Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1177/549821

date	job status	comment
Sep 18 12:30:57 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `549821` awaits release by job manager
Sep 18 12:32:02 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 18 12:33:04 UTC 2025	running	job `549821` is running
Sep 18 13:37:49 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-549821.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17582023010.tar.gz` size: 37 MiB (39395735 bytes) entries: 5986 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all `Ninja/1.11.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `PCRE2/10.40-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Python/2.7.18-GCCcore-12.2.0-bare.lua` `double-conversion/3.2.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `libpng/1.6.38-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `re2c/3.0-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software `Ninja/1.11.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `PCRE2/10.40-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Python/2.7.18-GCCcore-12.2.0-bare` `double-conversion/3.2.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `libpng/1.6.38-GCCcore-12.2.0` `re2c/3.0-GCCcore-12.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Sep 18 13:37:49 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 581.914 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 580.69 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.65 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.68 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8766.86 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8660.47 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-549821.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

bedroge · 2025-09-23T20:16:48Z

These builds didn't work because of the Rust 1.65.0 issue. The updated hook from EESSI/software-layer-scripts#86 should make sure that we use Rust 1.75.0 (from #1200), so let's give this another try.

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-23T20:16:57Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1177/553732

date	job status	comment
Sep 23 20:16:55 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `553732` awaits release by job manager
Sep 23 20:16:59 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 23 20:18:02 UTC 2025	running	job `553732` is running
Sep 23 20:26:19 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-553732.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17586588100.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (45 bytes) entries: 0 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Sep 23 20:26:19 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 582.68 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 585.195 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.68 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.69 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8767.94 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8686.3 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-553732.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

bedroge · 2025-09-24T05:19:57Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-24T05:20:05Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1177/553802

date	job status	comment
Sep 24 05:20:04 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `553802` awaits release by job manager
Sep 24 05:20:43 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 24 05:21:46 UTC 2025	running	job `553802` is running
Sep 24 05:58:12 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-553802.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17586932340.tar.gz` size: 35 MiB (37067751 bytes) entries: 6044 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all `Mako/1.2.4-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `NASM/2.15.05-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `NSPR/4.35-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Python/2.7.18-GCCcore-12.2.0-bare.lua` `double-conversion/3.2.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `graphite2/1.3.14-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `libjpeg-turbo/2.1.4-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `re2c/3.0-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `snappy/1.1.9-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software `Mako/1.2.4-GCCcore-12.2.0` `NASM/2.15.05-GCCcore-12.2.0` `NSPR/4.35-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Python/2.7.18-GCCcore-12.2.0-bare` `double-conversion/3.2.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `graphite2/1.3.14-GCCcore-12.2.0` `libjpeg-turbo/2.1.4-GCCcore-12.2.0` `re2c/3.0-GCCcore-12.2.0` `snappy/1.1.9-GCCcore-12.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Sep 24 05:58:12 UTC 2025	test result	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Reason EESSI test suite was not run, test step itself failed to execute. Details ✅ job output file `slurm-553802.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

bedroge · 2025-09-24T07:09:41Z

Still failed because of the same issue with terse, maybe I was a bit too early. Let's try again.

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

edit: ah, no, I checked the wrong log file. The last build actually failed because of a download issue:

== Running pre-fetch hook...
  >> download failed: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_85_RTM/src/nss-3.85.tar.gz
  >> download failed: https://sources.easybuild.io/n/NSS/nss-3.85.tar.gz
== ... (took 51 secs)
== FAILED: Installation ended unsuccessfully (build directory: /tmp/eessibot/easybuild/build/NSS/3.85/GCCcore-12.2.0): build failed (first 300 chars): Couldn't find file nss-3.85.tar.g
z anywhere, and downloading it didn't work either... Paths attempted (in order): /cvmfs/software.eessi.io/versions/2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software/EasyBuild/4.8.2/easybui
ld/easyconfigs/n/NSS/n/NSS/nss-3.85.tar.gz, /cvmfs/software.eessi.io/versions/2023. (took 51 secs)

I can download that file without any issues, so let's see what happens this time.

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-24T07:09:49Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1177/553817

date	job status	comment
Sep 24 07:09:48 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `553817` awaits release by job manager
Sep 24 07:10:31 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 24 07:11:35 UTC 2025	running	job `553817` is running
Sep 24 10:55:06 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-553817.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17587108930.tar.gz` size: 79 MiB (83552917 bytes) entries: 9174 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all `JasPer/4.0.0-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Mako/1.2.4-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `NASM/2.15.05-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `NSPR/4.35-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `NSS/3.85-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `Python/2.7.18-GCCcore-12.2.0-bare.lua` `double-conversion/3.2.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `graphite2/1.3.14-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `gzip/1.12-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `libdrm/2.4.114-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `libglvnd/1.6.0-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `libjpeg-turbo/2.1.4-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `libunwind/1.6.2-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `lz4/1.9.4-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `nodejs/18.12.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `re2c/3.0-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `snappy/1.1.9-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` `zstd/1.5.2-GCCcore-12.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software `JasPer/4.0.0-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Mako/1.2.4-GCCcore-12.2.0` `NASM/2.15.05-GCCcore-12.2.0` `NSPR/4.35-GCCcore-12.2.0` `NSS/3.85-GCCcore-12.2.0` `Python/2.7.18-GCCcore-12.2.0-bare` `double-conversion/3.2.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `graphite2/1.3.14-GCCcore-12.2.0` `gzip/1.12-GCCcore-12.2.0` `libdrm/2.4.114-GCCcore-12.2.0` `libglvnd/1.6.0-GCCcore-12.2.0` `libjpeg-turbo/2.1.4-GCCcore-12.2.0` `libunwind/1.6.2-GCCcore-12.2.0` `lz4/1.9.4-GCCcore-12.2.0` `nodejs/18.12.1-GCCcore-12.2.0` `re2c/3.0-GCCcore-12.2.0` `snappy/1.1.9-GCCcore-12.2.0` `zstd/1.5.2-GCCcore-12.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Sep 24 10:55:06 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 582.189 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 585.048 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.72 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.7 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8480.33 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8555.65 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-553817.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

bedroge · 2025-09-24T11:25:33Z

The LLVM build failed:

/tmp/eb-2llwp9cq/eb-fxhc1oex/cck4kRMa.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/eb-2llwp9cq/eb-fxhc1oex/cck4kRMa.s:18047: Error: immediate offset out of range 0 to 31 at operand 3 -- `st1b z2.d,p0,[z0.d,#88]'
make[2]: *** [lib/Transforms/Utils/CMakeFiles/LLVMTransformUtils.dir/build.make:289: lib/Transforms/Utils/CMakeFiles/LLVMTransformUtils.dir/CodeLayout.cpp.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/eessibot/easybuild/build/LLVM/15.0.5/GCCcore-12.2.0/easybuild_obj'
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:10253: lib/Transforms/Utils/CMakeFiles/LLVMTransformUtils.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

This is basically the same error as we observed for Rust 1.65.0 (see #1138). That makes sense, as that particular Rust version includes LLVM 15.

ocaisa · 2025-09-24T11:30:04Z

I don't think we should waste more time on this, it's not a good use of our limited resources

ocaisa · 2025-09-24T11:32:15Z

Do you think that bumping the LLVM version might be the solution? That is likely to appear for a few packages...

bedroge · 2025-09-24T11:41:30Z

Do you think that bumping the LLVM version might be the solution? That is likely to appear for a few packages...

That might work, I checked the local stack on Deucalion and they have these versions installed with EB:

14.0.3-GCCcore-11.3.0  16.0.6-GCCcore-12.3.0  18.1.8-GCCcore-13.3.0

So we could try to bump it to 16.0.6. The good thing is that 15.0.5 only seems to be used by Mesa:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aeasybuilders%2Feasybuild-easyconfigs%20LLVM%2015.0.5&type=code

bedroge · 2025-10-01T09:22:03Z

Found another workaround (which probably would have solved the Rust issue too): I tried building LLVM 15.0.5 with optarch=march=armv8.2-a and that worked. I think this basically disables SVE; don't know how much that matters for LLVM itself, but since it's not used a lot anyway, I propose we go ahead and use this solution. I'll open a PR to add this to the hooks file.

{2023.06}[2022b,a64fx] Qt5 5.15.7, QuantumESPRESSO 7.2

b705bb5

Merge branch 'EESSI:main' into 2023.06-a64fx-2022b-eb482-remaining-apps

7175f30

This was referenced Sep 23, 2025

Don't print messages from hook in --terse mode EESSI/software-layer-scripts#82

Merged

check EB version when checking if terse build option is used EESSI/software-layer-scripts#90

Merged

bedroge mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2025

{2023.06}[2022b,a64fx] Dependencies of Qt5 #1202

Merged

Merge branch 'main' into 2023.06-a64fx-2022b-eb482-remaining-apps

0e83606

hvelab mentioned this pull request Sep 29, 2025

Notes on building the stack for Fujitsu A64FX #1024

Open

2 tasks

bedroge mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2025

LLVM 15.0.5 build fails on A64FX #1213

Closed

{2023.06}[2022b,a64fx] Qt5 5.15.7, QuantumESPRESSO 7.2 #1177

Are you sure you want to change the base?

{2023.06}[2022b,a64fx] Qt5 5.15.7, QuantumESPRESSO 7.2 #1177

Uh oh!

Conversation

agimenog commented Sep 4, 2025

Uh oh!

agimenog commented Sep 4, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 4, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

agimenog commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

agimenog commented Sep 18, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 18, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 23, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 23, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 24, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 24, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 24, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

ocaisa commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

ocaisa commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 23, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

bedroge commented Sep 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Sep 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading