Correct IcoswISC30E3r5 to gis1to10kmR2 mapping file name.

[stephenprice]

This PR corrects the name of the mapping file between IcoswISC30E3r5 and gis1to10kmR2 in /cime_config/config_grids.xml.

This fix has been tested and confirmed working (fixing a problem where the mapping file was not found upon executing case.submit).

Note that there is currently an inconsistency between the filename used on line no. 5964 of config_grids.xml (Greenland 1to1km init. cond. file) and the related line no. 5839 (Greenland 20km init. cond. file). That should also be rectified as part of this pull request.

[jonbob]

@rljacob -- I think we discussed this, but I couldn't find it anywhere. Anyway, we have been committing mapping filenames like:

map_IcoswISC30E3r5_to_gis1to10kmR2_esmfneareststod.20240422.deeperThan300m.nc

but I think we had decided that

map_IcoswISC30E3r5_to_gis1to10kmR2_esmfneareststod.deeperThan300m.20240422.nc

fit our naming convention better. There are only three or four of these files currently, so we would like to pick a naming style and make them all consistent in this PR

[rljacob]

What we have in our confluence page is "map_grida_to_gridb_Optionaltext.ToolAlgorithm.YYYYMMDD.nc" so it should be map_IcoswISC30E3r5_to_gis1to10kmR2_deeperThan300m.esmfneareststod.20240422.nc.

[jonbob]

@rljacob -- just what we needed to know. Thanks

[jonbob]

Following @rljacob's comment, I made the deeperThan300m mapping file names self-consistent and matching the E3SM naming convention. @stephenprice -- I also changed the MALI resolution in the new mapping file from "gis_1to10km_r02" to "gis1to10kmR2" to match the other mapping files. Please let me know if you want to change it back

[jonbob]

Copied old filenames to new filenames in the inputdata repo and lcrc local inputdata directory, in order to allow old versions of the code to still find the files

[jonbob]

Passes:

• SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg2_r05_IcoswISC30E3r5.WCYCL1850.chrysalis_intel.allactive-wcprod
• e3sm_landice_developer on chrysalis using gnu, except
  • ERS.ne30pg2_r05_IcoswISC30E3r5_gis20.IGELM_MLI.chrysalis_gnu.mali-gis20km failed due to a CIME issue
    with ERS?
  • SMS.ne30pg2_r05_IcoswISC30E3r5_gis20.BGWCYCL1850.chrysalis_gnu.allactive-gis20km had an expected
    NML DIFF due to new mapping file name

[jonbob]

Approved based on testing and discussion on naming convention

[stephenprice]

These changes all look good to me. Thanks Jon and Rob.

[jonbob]

merged to next

[jonbob]

merged to master and expected NML DIFFs blessed