Skip to content

Conversation

@tabufan
Copy link
Contributor

@tabufan tabufan commented Nov 26, 2025

sUSDD is an ERC-4626 yield-bearing vault token, similar to MakerDAO’s sDAI.
When users deposit USDD into the sUSDD vault, the underlying USDD is burned by the protocol, and the user only receives sUSDD as the claim on the burned USDD plus accrued yield. This means:

sUSDD is not an additional circulating asset
minting sUSDD does not increase the total market cap of the USDD ecosystem
Here is an example of minting sUSDD transaction: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xd2f954622b173a8df95361506e42da5913d5a33e2bb60a3d3ea257c35a19ca2c , as you can see, the USDD was burned and sUSDD was minted

image

Therefore, tracking sUSDD as a separate pegged asset causes double-counting of market cap, since its underlying USDD no longer circulates independently. The correct accounting method is to treat sUSDD as a yield-bearing wrapper, not as a second stablecoin.

Given that DeFiLlama already applies the same logic to sDAI and other ERC-4626 vault wrappers, the treatment for sUSDD should be consistent. The DAI circulating supply calculation: https://github.com/DefiLlama/peggedassets-server/blob/master/src/adapters/peggedAssets/dai/index.ts

Happy to provide more technical details or documentation if needed.

@realdealshaman realdealshaman merged commit 2748cb8 into DefiLlama:master Dec 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants