Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrations Logs E2E Rotation Flaky Fix #32586

Merged
merged 40 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

soberpeach
Copy link
Contributor

@soberpeach soberpeach commented Dec 31, 2024

What does this PR do?

Fixes flakiness in the integrations logs e2e test by accumulating logs in a slice before testing their monotonic counter, as opposed to testing each log as it came in.

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Fixes flaky test

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

soberpeach and others added 30 commits November 11, 2024 22:10
@soberpeach soberpeach requested a review from a team as a code owner December 31, 2024 16:06
@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time team/agent-metrics-logs labels Dec 31, 2024
@soberpeach soberpeach added qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation changelog/no-changelog labels Dec 31, 2024
@soberpeach soberpeach added this to the 7.62.0 milestone Dec 31, 2024
@soberpeach soberpeach changed the title Lucas.liseth/integration log rotation e2e test Integrations Logs E2E Rotation Flaky Fix Dec 31, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 31, 2024

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 52058150 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=52058150 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit a597abe

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 91a4b6db7659722eb09def0f950ea772ce50ed4d

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.05MB ⚠️ 1191.10MB 1191.04MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.05MB ⚠️ 1200.41MB 1200.36MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.05MB ⚠️ 1200.41MB 1200.36MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 944.68MB 944.67MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 935.38MB 935.37MB 140.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 78.54MB 78.54MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 78.62MB 78.62MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 78.62MB 78.62MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 55.75MB 55.75MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 505.27MB 505.27MB 70.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.34MB 113.34MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 113.41MB 113.41MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 113.41MB 113.41MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 108.81MB 108.81MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 108.88MB 108.88MB 10.00MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 2d8078ec-0df6-4ef6-bdba-1b5801619b83

Baseline: 91a4b6d
Comparison: a597abe
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.66 [-2.55, +3.86] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.37 [-0.44, +1.18] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.25 [+0.22, +0.29] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_tree memory utilization +0.10 [-0.03, +0.22] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.09 [+0.01, +0.17] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.05 [-0.59, +0.69] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.73, +0.82] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.12, +0.13] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.74, +0.71] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput -0.03 [-0.92, +0.86] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.03 [-0.95, +0.88] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.86, +0.79] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.09 [-0.57, +0.39] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.28 [-0.96, +0.39] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.55 [-0.61, -0.49] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Copy link
Member

@gh123man gh123man left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some minor comments

@soberpeach
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2025-01-03 15:26:27 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 35m.


2025-01-03 16:04:18 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit ae3044e into main Jan 3, 2025
211 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the lucas.liseth/integration-log-rotation-e2e-test branch January 3, 2025 16:04
@github-actions github-actions bot modified the milestones: 7.62.0, 7.63.0 Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/agent-metrics-logs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants