-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
annotated-dic #326
Comments
That |
Hi Jacob. Different application use different approach for cell annotation like spatial location and marker expression. is there any database for expression profiles. or you found them based different publications. Best regards, |
In this case, the values are normalized between 0 and 1. So for a cell to be "CD4+", it must have CD4 expression above some threshold - here the threshold is set at 0.5. In other words, the rule says that if CD4 marker is above 0.5 then the cell is CD4+. Determining the best set of rules for your specific case isn't really something we can help with, because the rules to use would probably vary for each experiment. You would need to combine experimental design (i.e. which markers did you choose for the experiment, what tissue types are you looking at, how were the images captured, etc.) with domain knowledge (which cell populations do you want to identify, etc.). A literature search would probably be a good place to start. Hope this helps! |
Hello,
I hope you are doing well,
Could you please let me know where did you get annot_dict at step 30 of CODEX analysis. Do you recommend to use this dictionary or change it ??
Your help is appreciated
Best regards,
afshin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: