Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

annotated-dic #326

Open
afshinmoradi opened this issue Aug 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

annotated-dic #326

afshinmoradi opened this issue Aug 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@afshinmoradi
Copy link

Hello,

I hope you are doing well,

Could you please let me know where did you get annot_dict at step 30 of CODEX analysis. Do you recommend to use this dictionary or change it ??

Your help is appreciated
Best regards,

afshin

@afshinmoradi afshinmoradi added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 15, 2022
@jacob-rosenthal
Copy link
Collaborator

That annot_dict was manually created for rules-based phenotyping from marker levels. You can use it if you want but it isn't general-purpose and may need to be modified based on your specific application, for example it may not be exactly applicable under different marker panels, tissue types, cells populations, disease states, etc.

@afshinmoradi
Copy link
Author

Hi Jacob.
Thanks for clarification. it is much appreciated.

Different application use different approach for cell annotation like spatial location and marker expression.
I know about markers for each cell types, but I don't know about expression profiles.
I am wondering how did you specified these marker threshold for example
'CD4':(0.50, 1.0) is for 'CD4+ T lymphocytes' cell
'CD4':(0.0, 0.50) is for 'CD3+ T lymphocytes' cell

is there any database for expression profiles. or you found them based different publications.

Best regards,

@jacob-rosenthal
Copy link
Collaborator

In this case, the values are normalized between 0 and 1. So for a cell to be "CD4+", it must have CD4 expression above some threshold - here the threshold is set at 0.5. In other words, the rule says that if CD4 marker is above 0.5 then the cell is CD4+.

Determining the best set of rules for your specific case isn't really something we can help with, because the rules to use would probably vary for each experiment. You would need to combine experimental design (i.e. which markers did you choose for the experiment, what tissue types are you looking at, how were the images captured, etc.) with domain knowledge (which cell populations do you want to identify, etc.). A literature search would probably be a good place to start. Hope this helps!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants