Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restructure section on realization #25

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

berndflemisch
Copy link
Collaborator

Change structure of the realization section. In the new first subsection, present funding possibilities. Assemble the transition pathway in the second subsection, adding the conceptualization phase. Keep outsourcing and staff acquisition as is.

Fixes #9.

@CaptainSifff CaptainSifff self-requested a review February 28, 2024 08:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@CaptainSifff CaptainSifff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!

In this way, an applicant can book a fixed number of working hours from the RSE pool and pay for the costs accordingly.
This model has been successfully implemented at several UK universities.
In order to scale, it needs to be supported by an institutional policy.
Larger collaborative projects can apply for funding as part of a central INF project.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we explain INF projects? Mine is still called Z03 ....

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could exemplify and spell it out: "as part of, for example, an information infrastructure project"

@dokempf
Copy link
Collaborator

dokempf commented Feb 28, 2024

I resolved the existing conflict against main. It was caused by #7 that added the survey results as the first part of the realization chapter. Should we keep it this way? Or rather move the survey results elsewhere?

@berndflemisch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm fine with both, tending to have it as a separate section before the realization strategy. In terms of "4 This is our vision, 5 There are existing instances substantiating the vision, 6 This is how you may create your own instance".

@dokempf dokempf force-pushed the restructure-realization branch from f0e7b7d to b8b2b4f Compare March 4, 2024 12:34
@dokempf
Copy link
Collaborator

dokempf commented Mar 4, 2024

I have now redone the merge conflict resolution as a separate top level chapter. Will merge this later.

@dokempf dokempf merged commit fee866e into main Mar 4, 2024
1 check passed
@dokempf dokempf deleted the restructure-realization branch March 4, 2024 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Polish subsection structure in realization
3 participants