Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Defined notes for BSI SYS.1.6.A24 and A25 #12471

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

benruland
Copy link
Contributor

Description:

Added notes for two BSI SYS.1.6 controls

Rationale:

As we have multiple customers asking for a BSI profile to be included in the compliance-operator, we are contributing a profile. To provide a better review process, the individual controle are implemented as separate PRs.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Hi @benruland. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Used by openshift-ci bot. label Oct 4, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request:

Fedora Environment
Open in Gitpod

Oracle Linux 8 Environment
Open in Gitpod

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

🤖 A k8s content image for this PR is available at:
ghcr.io/complianceascode/k8scontent:12471
This image was built from commit: 6996838

Click here to see how to deploy it

If you alread have Compliance Operator deployed:
utils/build_ds_container.py -i ghcr.io/complianceascode/k8scontent:12471

Otherwise deploy the content and operator together by checking out ComplianceAsCode/compliance-operator and:
CONTENT_IMAGE=ghcr.io/complianceascode/k8scontent:12471 make deploy-local

Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit 6996838 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 59.5% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

@jan-cerny jan-cerny added the OpenShift OpenShift product related. label Oct 16, 2024
@yuumasato yuumasato self-assigned this Oct 28, 2024
@yuumasato
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test Used by openshift-ci bot. and removed needs-ok-to-test Used by openshift-ci bot. labels Oct 28, 2024
Note: At the host level, Red Hat CoreOS supports auditd, which is enabled by default.
Policies for auditd can include network connections, created processes, file accesses and syscalls.
Red Hat CoreOS provides many sample policies that cover all of the areas described.
status: does not meet
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is not that appropriate. The requirement could be adressed by multiple solutions, among them ACS.

However, if a different solution such as Aqua Security is used, it could still be compliant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Used by openshift-ci bot. OpenShift OpenShift product related.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants