ENH: split latex expressions with terms_per_line
#414
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`str` is also `Iterable`.
redeboer
added
the
⚙️ Enhancement
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
redeboer
changed the title
terms_per_lineterms_per_line
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
ampform.io.aslatex()function got a new keyword argument,terms_per_line, that allows splittingsympy.Exprs over multiple lines in a LaTeXarray. By default, equations are not split, but setting it toterms_per_line=1or any other positive integer, splits expressions that are an addition of multiple terms over multiple lines. This is particularly useful for large amplitude expressions, e.g. (generated withaslatex(..., terms_per_line=1)):