Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Runnable code block example #241

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 25, 2023
Merged

Runnable code block example #241

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 25, 2023

Conversation

Rigidity
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Rigidity Rigidity marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2023 21:45
@Rigidity Rigidity marked this pull request as draft September 19, 2023 21:46
@socket-security
Copy link

New and updated dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Packages Version New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
clvm-lib 1.0.0 None +2 1.24 MB chia-automation
react-simple-code-editor 0.13.1 None +0 68.9 kB oliviertassinari
@docusaurus/core 2.4.0...2.4.1 None +26/-47 46.4 MB slorber
@docusaurus/preset-classic 2.4.0...2.4.1 None +50/-95 50.9 MB slorber
@docusaurus/plugin-google-analytics 2.4.0...2.4.1 None +27/-48 46.4 MB slorber
@docusaurus/plugin-google-gtag 2.4.0...2.4.1 None +27/-48 46.4 MB slorber

@Rigidity Rigidity marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2023 21:14
@mando222 mando222 merged commit 1942c7e into main Sep 25, 2023
3 checks passed
@mando222 mando222 deleted the runnable-code-blocks branch September 25, 2023 16:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mando222 mando222 mando222 approved these changes

@cmmarslender cmmarslender cmmarslender approved these changes

@danieljperry danieljperry Awaiting requested review from danieljperry

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@Rigidity @cmmarslender @mando222