Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

to bring CAIP-25 draft text up to date #163

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 10, 2022

Conversation

bumblefudge
Copy link
Collaborator

If merged, this would supersede #108 (see for older discussions) and also closes #142

CAIPs/caip-25.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CAIPs/caip-25.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CAIPs/caip-25.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bumblefudge
Copy link
Collaborator Author

open question, raised by @FrederikBolding : should the RPC call nest each of these provider objects named after namespaces into a parent array between params and eip155/cosmos/etc? i.e.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "provider_authorization",
  "params": {
    "namespaces": {
      "eip155": {
        "chains": [
          "eip155:1"
        ],
        "methods": [
          "eth_sendTransaction",
          "eth_signTransaction",
          "eth_sign",
          "personal_sign"
        ],
        "events": [
          "accountsChanged",
          "chainChanged"
        ]
      },
      "cosmos": {}
    }
  }
}

Bumblefudge and others added 2 commits October 26, 2022 13:55
Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
@bumblefudge bumblefudge merged commit 69b8f2c into ChainAgnostic:master Nov 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CAIP-25: Is "handshake" the appropriate word for the CAIP-25 procedure?
2 participants