Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Posibility to Merge only Literature #1340

Open
camiplata opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Posibility to Merge only Literature #1340

camiplata opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@camiplata
Copy link
Collaborator

The Plant List with Literature is one of the xrelease sources, Nevertheless @DianRHR and I have decided to keep it with the lowest possible priority as its taxonomy is outdated.
Nevertheless, this source literature information is very valuable. We could overcome this issues if we have an option to decide what we want to merge from each source regarding their of additional data. In this particular example to have the option to merge only literature references but no names.

@mdoering mdoering transferred this issue from CatalogueOfLife/checklistbank Jul 8, 2024
@mdoering mdoering moved this to Todo in Software Development Jul 8, 2024
@mdoering
Copy link
Member

mdoering commented Jul 9, 2024

Can you give a few example of the noise being created if we add it in a regular way?

@camiplata
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ReCent example from GBIF gbif/backbone-feedback#504

@mdoering
Copy link
Member

mdoering commented Jul 9, 2024

we should offer a way to only merge publishedIn and augment existing references with a (BHL) link and/or DOI

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants