-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review Geranium #688
Comments
That merge is odd, the "Synonym Sources" doesn't inlcude those relations in their datasets:
|
Currently there is still one species as synonym of the genus: Geranium baicalense wich as mention by Diana above is related to a specific species name at the source, not the genus, this could rather be a merging issue, what do you think @mdoering |
Logs look as expected for the species:
|
It is a known well curated GSD
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/3LXRC/taxon/CDB6D
Species synonyms for a genus makes not much sense.
Do other mergers make sense?
World Flora Online Plant List 2024-06 seems to contribute a lot - which appears suspicous to me. Maybe we don't want to add names from that list if we have WFO already. Just the literature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: