Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lippert patch 1 #3

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Lippert patch 1 #3

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
8101ed3
Update open-source-software-prize.md to add GW instance
david-lippert Dec 21, 2024
74ad20f
Update lunch-and-learn.md gw ospo lunch & learn
david-lippert Dec 21, 2024
682b1a2
Update open-source-catalog.md GW OSPO project registry instance
david-lippert Dec 21, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion lunch-and-learn.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ Our investigation and the faculty luncheon resulted in a formal report from the

# Known Instances

[Syracuse University OSPO](https://opensource.syracuse.edu/), Syracuse University
* [Syracuse University OSPO](https://opensource.syracuse.edu/), Syracuse University
* [GW Coders Lunch & Learn Series](https://gwcoders.github.io/studyGroup/#events), George Washington University - The GW OSPO partners with the existing GW Coders group to increase the series from bi-weekly to weekly while adding an open source and collaborative development focus to the group.

# References

Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions open-source-catalog.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ One of the objectives of the university-wide ‘[Open Source Software Prize](htt
* [JHU Open Source Programs Office](https://ospo.library.jhu.edu/), Sheridan Libraries, Johns Hopkins University
* [Georgia Tech Open Source Program Office](https://ospo.cc.gatech.edu/), Georgia Institute of Technology
* [OpenSource@Stanford](https://opensource.stanford.edu/), Stanford Data Science Center for Open and Reproducible Science (CORES), Leland Stanford Junior University
* [GW OSPO Project Registry](https://ospo.gwu.edu/project-registry), George Washington University

# References

Expand Down
24 changes: 22 additions & 2 deletions open-source-software-prize.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -61,6 +61,24 @@ A sample evaluation rubric may include:
3. **Open Source Best Practices**: Evaluated adherence to principles like transparent development, documentation, and community engagement.
4. **Diversity and Inclusion**: May be used as a tie-breaker, prioritizing projects with diverse and inclusive leadership or contributor communities.

Additional evaluation rubrics used by the GW OSPO for their student awards

**Open Source Project Awards**

Criteria - judging based on 4 categories evaluated with equal weight
* 25% - Reproducibility - care taken to ensure the project is easily and accurately reproducible
* 25% - Impact - Meaningful and interesting project
* 25% - Adherence to open-source and software development best practices
* 25% - Collaboration - inclusivity, cross discipline, demonstrative community building

**Individual Contributor Awards**

Complete applications will be evaluated and must meet a minimum threshold to be entered in the lottery:
* Must include at least one meaningful contribution of code or documentation addressing existing issues and accepted by the maintainer of an existing active Project
* The project you contribute to may be a GW or external project, but our evaluation committee will verify that the contributions are beneficial and not trivial

Please take care to understand that project maintainers can be extremely busy, so to be a good open source contributor, follow the codes of conduct and contribution guidelines and focus on tackling existing issues that align with your abilities.

# Resulting Context

Entrants can be added to the existing project registry of open source projects within the university.
Expand All @@ -71,7 +89,8 @@ The open source best practices criterion of the scoring rubric can be used as a

# Known Instances

[OpenSource@Stanford](https://opensource.stanford.edu/), Stanford Data Science Center for Open and Reproducible Science (CORES), Leland Stanford Junior University
* [OpenSource@Stanford](https://opensource.stanford.edu/), Stanford Data Science Center for Open and Reproducible Science (CORES), Leland Stanford Junior University
* [GW OSPO Student Awards](https://ospo.gwu.edu/student-awards), George Washington University OSPO Student Award Program - Modeled after Stanford's program, with some modifications.

# References

Expand All @@ -86,4 +105,5 @@ The open source best practices criterion of the scoring rubric can be used as a
* Clare Dillon [https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6205-0296](https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6205-0296)
* Ciara Flanagan [https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3153-7673](https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3153-7673)
* Russell Poldrack [https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-0259](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-0259)
* Francesca Vera [https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-3854](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-3854)
* Francesca Vera [https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-3854](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-3854)
* David Lippert [https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6444-9595](https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6444-9595)