Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Revert "Test/backend/coverage utils functions"" #258

Merged

Conversation

u21631532
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #257

@u21631532 u21631532 closed this Jul 30, 2024
@u21631532 u21631532 reopened this Jul 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 52.17391% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.34%. Comparing base (684116c) to head (6e2d829).

Files Patch % Lines
occupi-backend/pkg/utils/utils.go 52.17% 8 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #258      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    77.57%   76.34%   -1.23%     
===========================================
  Files           21        9      -12     
  Lines         1984     1788     -196     
===========================================
- Hits          1539     1365     -174     
+ Misses         404      377      -27     
- Partials        41       46       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@u21631532 u21631532 merged commit aae8adf into develop Jul 30, 2024
7 of 11 checks passed
@u21631532 u21631532 deleted the revert-257-revert-250-test/backend/coverage-utils-functions branch July 30, 2024 21:34
waveyboym pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
…t/backend/coverage-utils-functions

Revert "Revert "Test/backend/coverage utils functions""
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant