Update bavet129 130 #2756
Update bavet129 130 #2756
Conversation
MassimoVilla
requested review from
eu-genia,
nafisa-valieva,
karljonaskarlsson and
CarstenHoffmannMarburg
| <msItem xml:id="ms_i2.2"> | ||
| <locus from="106r"/> | ||
| <title type="complete" xml:lang="gez" ref="LIT6404Dersan4recA">Homily of John Chrysostom</title> | ||
| <incipit xml:lang="gez">በእንተ፡ ፬እንስሳ፡ ዓበይት፡ መንፈሳውያን፡ አመ፳ለወርኃ፡ ኅዳር፡</incipit> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Contrary to my previous comments in another pull request, it is recommended to have a space between a number and a following word, as @thea-m pointed out to me recently, i.e. ፬ እንስሳ፡. Sorry for the confusion!
Thank you @CarstenHoffmannMarburg , I follow a past decision to always have a space after a numeral for better searchability (taken for the bodleian project and not necessarily relevant per se for bm, but I think it makes sense). I would not like to include word dividers where there are none in the manuscripts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No problem, thank you for confirming that we add a space after the numeral
VaticanBAV/et/BAVet129.xml
Outdated
| <!-- Data don't match. | ||
| The quire structure illustrated in the catalogues gives a total number of 133 ff., while the catalogues | ||
| state that the manuscript has 131 ff. In order to reconcile the two data, one can assume that the first | ||
| two folia are blank and were not counted by the cataloguers (MKr-MV) --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think, this information should be given in a note. However, I do not understand, why they necessarily must be the first two folia, but not one or two at the end. My suggestion:
<note>The quire structure as given in the catalogues ends with a total of 133 folios, while the same catalogues state that the manuscript has 131 folios. In order to reconcile the two data, it can be assumed that two folios either before or after the text block are blank and have not been counted.</note>
For me, it is OK not to give a for each quire, unless it would be nice to give loci here as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for the suggestion about <note/>. Regarding the loci, in principle I try to give them every time the quire sequence is clear or can be easily reconstructed, but in this very case I preferred not to give loci because data are inconsistent and we do not know exactly the origin of the divergence.
Revision of MSS BAVet129 (Harp of the Virgin, Hymn to Mary, Anaphora of John) and BAVet130 (collection of texts on the archangel Raphael)