-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Ensure dns disabled for networks #3866
Open
jaitaiwan
wants to merge
1
commit into
Azure:master
Choose a base branch
from
jaitaiwan:jaitaiwan/hotfix-v20240906.00
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Podman creates the default bridge network with dns_enabled to false. Subsequent calls to podman network create then create bridge networks where dns_enabled is set to true causing containers on said network to make use of podman's dnsutil plugin. This results in latency issues for gateway connections. This change ensures that networks created use similar settings to that of the default bridge network which has no latency issues.
jaitaiwan
requested review from
jewzaam,
bennerv,
hawkowl,
rogbas,
petrkotas,
jharrington22,
cblecker,
cadenmarchese,
UlrichSchlueter,
SudoBrendan,
yjst2012,
anshulvermapatel,
hlipsig,
tiguelu,
SrinivasAtmakuri,
mociarain,
kimorris27,
tsatam and
bitoku
as code owners
September 26, 2024 01:45
/azp run ci, e2e |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run ci |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Please rebase pull request. |
@jaitaiwan Is this PR still valid? |
Still relevant. We'll need this going forward when we start moving towards aks deployments as this will help to simulate the environment if I remember correctly and without dns-disabled we'll continue to see the same issues we saw in a previous incident. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue this PR addresses:
Fixes a latency issue with outbound connections caused by the creation of dedicated podman networks.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fix a regression in outbound connection latency.
Test plan for issue:
RP deploy
Full details
Podman creates the default bridge network with dns_enabled to false. Subsequent calls to podman network create then create bridge networks where dns_enabled is set to true causing containers on said network to make use of podman's dnsutil plugin. This results in latency issues for gateway connections.
This change ensures that networks created use similar settings to that of the default bridge network which has no latency issues.
Which issue this PR addresses:
Fixes
What this PR does / why we need it:
Test plan for issue:
Is there any documentation that needs to be updated for this PR?
How do you know this will function as expected in production?