-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Significantly simplified boundary condition application in the stepper #69
Significantly simplified boundary condition application in the stepper #69
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Looks much cleaner now. There are some issues with the BC handling for ZouHe and Regularized that I have suggested proper changes.
… the same bc type multiple times
59cbe8e
to
9fe1a21
Compare
9fe1a21
to
0123748
Compare
Please review again. I completely rewrote the PR and managed to significantly improve the BC implementation. |
This also fixes an issue that now we can have multiple boundary conditions of the same kind in a simulation. |
Very nice Work! |
Use wp.static to avoid branching in the kernels for BCs that don't exist: