You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your excellent work,I want to know if there is a more flexible GMR, similar to sklearn, which can limit the covariance type to ‘shared’, ‘spherical’ or ‘diag'. Sometimes we don’t need a 'full' type of covariance matrix. I look forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I got it, thanks, but whether the GMR can be used for prediction with the same input and output, such as time series anomaly detection tasks, add some noise to the input, and fix it through GMR, if it is normal data, it can be reconstructed well, and the prediction errors will be very large if it is abnormal
This could be possible. Pass the noisy data as X and the denoised data as y to the method GMR.fit. Let me know whether it works as you need it. I don't know. My guess is that you cannot really distinguish noise that is not normally distributed from normally distributed noise if you only have a few samples.
Repository owner
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Feb 4, 2022
Thank you for your excellent work,I want to know if there is a more flexible GMR, similar to sklearn, which can limit the covariance type to ‘shared’, ‘spherical’ or ‘diag'. Sometimes we don’t need a 'full' type of covariance matrix. I look forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: