Feature: Added largest PRs list #53
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new properties to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/converters/types.ts (1)
40-40: Add JSDoc comment explaining sizePoints calculationThe
sizePointsfield would benefit from documentation explaining how it's calculated (additions + deletions/2) to help other developers understand its meaning and purpose.+ /** Points representing PR size, calculated as: additions + (deletions/2) */ sizePoints: number;src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-134: Implementation partially meets PR objectives.While the changes add size tracking capabilities, several key requirements from issue #52 are not yet implemented:
- The configurable list of largest PRs
- Size categorization (xs, s, m, l, xl)
- Configuration options for size thresholds
Consider these architectural recommendations:
Create a separate configuration module for size-related settings:
- Size category thresholds
- Number of PRs to display in the largest PRs list
- Custom weighing factors for additions/deletions
Implement a dedicated function for generating the largest PRs list:
interface LargestPRsConfig { limit: number; minSize?: string; // e.g., 'm' } function getLargestPRs( prs: PullRequestTimelineInfo[], config: LargestPRsConfig ): PullRequestTimelineInfo[]Consider adding PR type classification to better weigh different kinds of changes:
- Feature additions
- Refactoring
- Formatting
- Documentation
Would you like me to create a detailed GitHub issue to track these remaining implementation tasks?
src/view/utils/createTotalTable.ts (3)
45-45: Specify radix inparseIntto avoid unexpected behaviorWhen using
parseInt, it's recommended to specify the radix parameter to prevent unexpected results, especially with strings that may have leading zeros.Apply this diff to specify the radix explicitly:
.slice(0, parseInt(getValueAsIs("TOP_LIST_AMOUNT"))) + .slice(0, parseInt(getValueAsIs("TOP_LIST_AMOUNT"), 10))
47-48: Provide default values for item propertiesIf
item.title,item.additions, oritem.deletionsareundefined, it could result in 'undefined' appearing in the output string.Consider providing default values to ensure the output is clean:
.map((item) => ({ - text: `${item.title}(+${item.additions}/-${item.deletions})`, + text: `${item.title || "Untitled"}(+${item.additions || 0}/-${item.deletions || 0})`, link: item.link || "", })) || [];
55-55: Clarify the PR size calculation formula in the descriptionFor better readability and to reflect the correct order of operations, consider adding parentheses to the formula in the description.
Update the formula as follows:
"**PR Size** - determined using the formula: -`additions + deletions * 0.5`. Based on this calculation... +`additions + (deletions * 0.5)`. Based on this calculation...
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
README.mdis excluded by none and included by nonebuild/index.jsis excluded by!build/**and included by nonepackage.jsonis excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/converters/types.ts(1 hunks)src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts(1 hunks)src/view/utils/createTotalTable.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts (1)
92-111: LGTM! Clean formatting of time-related properties.
The consistent formatting pattern improves readability while maintaining the existing functionality.
src/view/utils/createTotalTable.ts (1)
10-11: Imports updated appropriately
The addition of createList, createTable, and getValueAsIs in the import statements is correct, as these functions are utilized in the updated code below.
Pull Request
Description
Added list with the largest PRs.
Related Issue(s)
Type of Change
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
sizePoints,additions, anddeletions.Bug Fixes
Refactor