Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

POC: use Buf and protocompile for protobuf schemas #915

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

keejon
Copy link
Contributor

@keejon keejon commented Jul 12, 2024

This is a POC to validate if it is feasible to replace existing protobuf parser with protocompile and compatibility checks with Buf breaking changes.

@keejon keejon force-pushed the keejon/poc/proto-go branch 4 times, most recently from 4b9f53f to aaf7361 Compare July 12, 2024 20:57
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 12, 2024

Coverage report

Click to see where and how coverage changed

FileStatementsMissingCoverageCoverage
(new stmts)
Lines missing
  karapace/protobuf
  one_of_element.py
  karapace/protobuf/protopace
  __init__.py
  protopace.py 24, 63-66, 177-181, 185-187, 191-196, 200-209, 213-222, 226-229
Project Total  

This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action

@keejon keejon changed the title poc: use Buf and protocompile for protobuf schemas POC: use Buf and protocompile for protobuf schemas Jul 12, 2024
@keejon keejon closed this Jul 16, 2024
@keejon keejon reopened this Jul 16, 2024
@keejon keejon force-pushed the keejon/poc/proto-go branch 2 times, most recently from 4531d06 to 40af564 Compare July 16, 2024 22:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant