Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: improve Ollama provider implementation #593

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

devin-ai-integration[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration bot commented Dec 19, 2024

🔍 Review Summary

Purpose

The primary objective of this release is to refactor the Ollama provider implementation. This involves enhancing its reliability and functionality by improving error handling and response processing in both streaming and non-streaming cases. Additionally, the release aims to standardize the interface with the introduction of ChatResponse and Choice classes, while also improving code quality and maintainability through type hints, documentation, and test coverage.

Changes

  • New Feature

    • Introduced ChatResponse and Choice classes to provide a more consistent interface.
  • Refactor

    • Enhanced the Ollama provider with improved error handling and response processing for both streaming and non-streaming scenarios.
    • Added type hints and extensive documentation in agentops/llms/providers/ollama.py.
  • Test

    • Developed new comprehensive integration tests to verify the streaming response format and error handling in tests/integration/test_ollama.py.

Impact

This release is expected to significantly enhance the functionality and reliability of the Ollama provider. The improved error handling and response processing will ensure robust functionality. The introduction of ChatResponse and Choice classes will create a more consistent and user-friendly interface. Enhanced documentation and type hints will improve maintainability, while comprehensive integration tests will ensure the robustness of the provider. Overall, this update is anticipated to greatly improve the system's performance and reliability.

Original Description

No existing description found

- Add ChatResponse and Choice classes for consistent interface
- Improve error handling and streaming response processing
- Update response handling for both streaming and non-streaming cases
- Add proper type hints and documentation
- Update tests to verify streaming response format

Co-Authored-By: Alex Reibman <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor Author

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

Add "(aside)" to your comment to have me ignore it.

Copy link

Walkthrough

This update refactors the Ollama provider implementation to enhance its functionality and reliability. Key changes include the introduction of ChatResponse and Choice classes for a more consistent interface, improved error handling, and refined response processing for both streaming and non-streaming scenarios. The update also adds comprehensive type hints and documentation to the codebase. Additionally, new tests have been implemented to verify the streaming response format, ensuring robust functionality and error management.

Changes

File(s) Summary
agentops/llms/providers/ollama.py Refactored the Ollama provider to include ChatResponse and Choice classes, improved error handling, and enhanced response processing for streaming and non-streaming cases. Added type hints and documentation.
tests/integration/test_ollama.py Created new integration tests for the Ollama provider to verify streaming response format and error handling.

🔗 Related PRs

Instructions

Emoji Descriptions:

  • ⚠️ Potential Issue - May require further investigation.
  • 🔒 Security Vulnerability - Fix to ensure system safety.
  • 💻 Code Improvement - Suggestions to enhance code quality.
  • 🔨 Refactor Suggestion - Recommendations for restructuring code.
  • ℹ️ Others - General comments and information.

Interact with the Bot:

  • Send a message or request using the format:
    @bot + *your message*
Example: @bot Can you suggest improvements for this code?
  • Help the Bot learn by providing feedback on its responses.
    @bot + *feedback*
Example: @bot Do not comment on `save_auth` function !

Execute a command using the format:

@bot + */command*

Example: @bot /updateCommit

Available Commands:

  • /updateCommit ✨: Apply the suggested changes and commit them (or Click on the Github Action button to apply the changes !)
  • /updateGuideline 🛠️: Modify an existing guideline.
  • /addGuideline ➕: Introduce a new guideline.

Tips for Using @bot Effectively:

  • Specific Queries: For the best results, be specific with your requests.
    🔍 Example: @bot summarize the changes in this PR.
  • Focused Discussions: Tag @bot directly on specific code lines or files for detailed feedback.
    📑 Example: @bot review this line of code.
  • Managing Reviews: Use review comments for targeted discussions on code snippets, and PR comments for broader queries about the entire PR.
    💬 Example: @bot comment on the entire PR.

Need More Help?

📚 Visit our documentation for detailed guides on using Entelligence.AI.
🌐 Join our community to connect with others, request features, and share feedback.
🔔 Follow us for updates on new features and improvements.

Comment on lines 109 to 121

def _override_chat(self):
import ollama

original_func["ollama.chat"] = ollama.chat
self._original_chat = ollama.chat

def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
# Call the original function with its original arguments
init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
result = original_func["ollama.chat"](*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=kwargs.get("session", None))
session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
result = self._original_chat(*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)

# Override the original method with the patched one
ollama.chat = patched_function

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Bug Fix:

Ensure Proper Session Management in Patched Function
The recent change in the _override_chat method involves popping the session from kwargs, which can lead to potential issues if the session is needed later in the function or elsewhere in the system. This could result in unexpected behavior or bugs, especially if other parts of the code rely on the presence of session in kwargs.

Recommendations:

  • Review the necessity of popping the session: Ensure that removing the session from kwargs does not affect other parts of the function or system.
  • Consider alternative approaches: If the session is required elsewhere, consider passing it explicitly or using a different mechanism to manage it.
  • Test thoroughly: Ensure that the changes do not break existing functionality by running comprehensive tests.

By addressing these points, you can maintain the integrity of the function and prevent potential issues related to session management.

🔧 Suggested Code Diff:

 def _override_chat(self):
     import ollama
 
     self._original_chat = ollama.chat
 
     def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
         init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
-        session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
+        session = kwargs.get("session", None)
         result = self._original_chat(*args, **kwargs)
         return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)
 
     ollama.chat = patched_function
📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
def _override_chat(self):
import ollama
original_func["ollama.chat"] = ollama.chat
self._original_chat = ollama.chat
def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
# Call the original function with its original arguments
init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
result = original_func["ollama.chat"](*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=kwargs.get("session", None))
session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
result = self._original_chat(*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)
# Override the original method with the patched one
ollama.chat = patched_function
def _override_chat(self):
import ollama
self._original_chat = ollama.chat
def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
session = kwargs.get("session", None) # Use get instead of pop to avoid removing session
result = self._original_chat(*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)
ollama.chat = patched_function
📜 Guidelines

• Use meaningful variable and function names following specific naming conventions
• Use exceptions for error handling, but avoid assert statements for critical logic


Comment on lines 135 to 147

def _override_chat_async_client(self):
from ollama import AsyncClient

original_func = {}
original_func["ollama.AsyncClient.chat"] = AsyncClient.chat
self._original_async_chat = AsyncClient.chat

async def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
# Call the original function with its original arguments
async def patched_function(self_client, *args, **kwargs):
init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
result = await original_func["ollama.AsyncClient.chat"](*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=kwargs.get("session", None))
session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
result = await self._original_async_chat(self_client, *args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)

# Override the original method with the patched one
AsyncClient.chat = patched_function

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Bug Fix:

Ensure Correct Overriding of Async Chat Function
The recent changes to the _override_chat_async_client method involve altering how the original async chat function is overridden. This change is critical as it can introduce logical errors if not handled correctly.

Key Points:

  • Session Handling: Ensure that the session parameter is consistently managed. The new implementation uses kwargs.pop("session", None), which is a good practice to avoid passing unexpected parameters to the original function.
  • Functionality Replication: Verify that the new method replicates the original functionality accurately. The patched function should behave identically to the original in terms of input and output, except for the additional instrumentation.

Recommendations:

  • Testing: Conduct thorough testing to ensure that the patched function behaves as expected in all scenarios, especially focusing on session management and response handling.
  • Documentation: Update any relevant documentation to reflect the changes in the method of overriding.

By following these steps, you can ensure that the changes do not introduce any regressions or unexpected behavior. 🛠️

🔧 Suggested Code Diff:

 def _override_chat_async_client(self):
     from ollama import AsyncClient

-    original_func = {}
-    original_func["ollama.AsyncClient.chat"] = AsyncClient.chat
+    self._original_async_chat = AsyncClient.chat

-    async def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
-        # Call the original function with its original arguments
+    async def patched_function(self_client, *args, **kwargs):
         init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
-        result = await original_func["ollama.AsyncClient.chat"](*args, **kwargs)
-        return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=kwargs.get("session", None))
+        session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
+        result = await self._original_async_chat(self_client, *args, **kwargs)
+        return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)

     # Override the original method with the patched one
     AsyncClient.chat = patched_function
📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
def _override_chat_async_client(self):
from ollama import AsyncClient
original_func = {}
original_func["ollama.AsyncClient.chat"] = AsyncClient.chat
self._original_async_chat = AsyncClient.chat
async def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
# Call the original function with its original arguments
async def patched_function(self_client, *args, **kwargs):
init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
result = await original_func["ollama.AsyncClient.chat"](*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=kwargs.get("session", None))
session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
result = await self._original_async_chat(self_client, *args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)
# Override the original method with the patched one
AsyncClient.chat = patched_function
def _override_chat_async_client(self):
from ollama import AsyncClient
self._original_async_chat = AsyncClient.chat
async def patched_function(self_client, *args, **kwargs):
init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
result = await self._original_async_chat(self_client, *args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)
# Override the original method with the patched one
AsyncClient.chat = patched_function
📜 Guidelines

• Use type annotations to improve code clarity and maintainability
• Follow PEP 8 style guide for consistent code formatting


Comment on lines 109 to 121

def _override_chat(self):
import ollama

original_func["ollama.chat"] = ollama.chat
self._original_chat = ollama.chat

def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
# Call the original function with its original arguments
init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
result = original_func["ollama.chat"](*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=kwargs.get("session", None))
session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
result = self._original_chat(*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)

# Override the original method with the patched one
ollama.chat = patched_function

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential Issue:

Ensure Safe Overriding of Core Functionality
The current change introduces a patched version of the ollama.chat function, which can lead to logical errors if not handled correctly. Overriding core functions can have significant implications, especially if the new implementation does not fully replicate the original behavior or introduces side effects.

Recommendations:

  • Replicate Original Behavior: Ensure that the patched function covers all scenarios handled by the original ollama.chat function. This includes edge cases and error handling.
  • Comprehensive Testing: Develop a suite of tests to verify the behavior of the patched function across various scenarios. This will help catch any discrepancies early.
  • Consider Dependency Injection: Instead of directly overriding the function, consider using dependency injection. This approach can help isolate changes and reduce the risk of unintended side effects.

By following these steps, you can mitigate the risks associated with overriding core functionality and ensure the system remains stable and reliable. 🛠️

🔧 Suggested Code Diff:

+    def _override_chat(self):
+        import ollama
+
+        self._original_chat = ollama.chat
+
+        def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
+            init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
+            session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
+            result = self._original_chat(*args, **kwargs)
+            return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)
+
+        ollama.chat = patched_function
📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
def _override_chat(self):
import ollama
original_func["ollama.chat"] = ollama.chat
self._original_chat = ollama.chat
def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
# Call the original function with its original arguments
init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
result = original_func["ollama.chat"](*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=kwargs.get("session", None))
session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
result = self._original_chat(*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)
# Override the original method with the patched one
ollama.chat = patched_function
def _override_chat(self):
import ollama
self._original_chat = ollama.chat
def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
try:
result = self._original_chat(*args, **kwargs)
except Exception as e:
# Handle exceptions that may occur during the chat operation
self.log_error(f"Error in chat operation: {str(e)}")
raise
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)
ollama.chat = patched_function
# Additional unit tests should be written to ensure the patched function behaves as expected
# across various scenarios, including edge cases and error conditions.
📜 Guidelines

• Write unit tests for your code
• Use meaningful variable and function names following specific naming conventions


Comment on lines 122 to 134

def _override_chat_client(self):
from ollama import Client

original_func["ollama.Client.chat"] = Client.chat
self._original_client_chat = Client.chat

def patched_function(*args, **kwargs):
# Call the original function with its original arguments
def patched_function(self_client, *args, **kwargs):
init_timestamp = get_ISO_time()
result = original_func["ollama.Client.chat"](*args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=kwargs.get("session", None))
session = kwargs.pop("session", None)
result = self._original_client_chat(self_client, *args, **kwargs)
return self.handle_response(result, kwargs, init_timestamp, session=session)

# Override the original method with the patched one
Client.chat = patched_function

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential Issue:

Ensure Robustness in Overriding Core Methods
The current change involves overriding the Client.chat method with a patched function. This approach can introduce unexpected behavior if the patched function does not fully replicate the original method's behavior. This is particularly critical as it can affect all parts of the system relying on this method, potentially leading to incorrect session handling or response processing.

Recommendations:

  • Replicate Original Behavior: Ensure that the patched function replicates all necessary behavior of the original Client.chat method. This includes handling all parameters and return values correctly.
  • Comprehensive Testing: Add comprehensive tests to verify that the new implementation handles all expected scenarios correctly, including edge cases. This will help in identifying any discrepancies introduced by the override.
  • Consider Alternative Approaches: Consider using a more controlled approach to modify behavior, such as subclassing or using dependency injection. This can minimize the risk of unintended side effects and improve maintainability.
  • Documentation: Clearly document the changes and the rationale behind overriding the method to aid future developers in understanding the modifications.

By following these steps, you can ensure that the system remains robust and reliable. 🛠️

📜 Guidelines

• Write unit tests for your code
• Use meaningful variable and function names following specific naming conventions


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants