Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

233 ml00 ex01 correction wrong examples #234

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

madvid
Copy link
Collaborator

@madvid madvid commented Aug 21, 2022

update des formules pour la sample variance et la sample standard deviation

@madvid madvid added the fixme label Aug 21, 2022
@madvid madvid self-assigned this Aug 21, 2022
@madvid madvid linked an issue Aug 21, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
6 tasks
Copy link
Member

@ezalos ezalos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really like how you simplified the variance equation:
going from: \frac{1}{m}\sum_{j = 1}^{m}{x_j} to \bar{x} which make it so much more readable.

I was curious if there was a reason for applying the opposite change for the equation of standard deviation ?

Concerning th info block, the addition to the percentile is great, now linear interpolation is clearly asked for, great !

@qfeuilla
Copy link
Member

qfeuilla commented Aug 29, 2022

i don't understand the (m - 1) in the first formula you changed, after the last '=' on top of the sigma.
image
How come the equation are equivalent by changing just that ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ML00 ex01 (correction): Wrong examples
3 participants