Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implicit #72

Merged
merged 213 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024
Merged

Implicit #72

merged 213 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

3dJan
Copy link
Contributor

@3dJan 3dJan commented Sep 20, 2024

Version 0.8 introduces an additional implicit namespace that contains implicit functions. Functions can now be represented by a functionfromimage3d (replacing the former scalar- and vectorfields) or by a new graph representation with basic math operations as nodes. Volumedata is now a resource that can be referenced by shape objects. The new object type <levelset> allows to use functions to define a levelset as a surface, replacing the former <boundary> element of <volumedata>.

jordig100 and others added 30 commits February 3, 2022 17:51
The schema might be incorrect, though.
* Clarify thin surface layer

* Vol. property MUST be applied
@3dJan
Copy link
Contributor Author

3dJan commented Sep 20, 2024

Should we add a Disclaimer like in most other extensions? Should we restore the Note regarding the pre-release status (removed in 0.7)?
The current version of mdToPdf.sh produces a pdf that cuts off the content at the left margin. The existing spec pdf files all have slightly different appearances. Is there one version that we should use as a reference?

@3dJan
Copy link
Contributor Author

3dJan commented Sep 20, 2024

Should we add a Disclaimer like in most other extensions? Should we restore the Note regarding the pre-release status (removed in 0.7)? The current version of mdToPdf.sh produces a pdf that cuts off the content at the left margin. The existing spec pdf files all have slightly different appearances. Is there one version that we should use as a reference?

We decided to add the Note again and the Disclaimer.

@jordig100
Copy link
Contributor

@3dJan 3dJan merged commit 0e45335 into master Sep 23, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants