Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is there a problem with the output of the discriminator? #14

Open
ripperthejack opened this issue Feb 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Is there a problem with the output of the discriminator? #14

ripperthejack opened this issue Feb 3, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@ripperthejack
Copy link

The generator is pre-trained and I used the dual discriminator just like:

ag3d_discriminator = legacy.load_network_pkl(f)['D'].to(args.device)
output = G.only_synthesis(ws=ws, c=c, truncation_psi=truncation)
full_logit = ag3d_discriminator.D_image(output,c)

but i got a low confidence around -10 , is that normal?

@shash29-dev
Copy link

Hi,
There is something it seems regarding discriminators.
I tried --
Training from Scratch: fake_depths and fake_images look alright (similar to sampled smpl pose). As training proceeds, fake_depths become total black and white. images go full background-- (white)
Training from provided weights: fake_depths and fake_images look alright (similar to sampled smpl pose, and realistic). As training proceeds, both deteriorate towards ---> fake_depths become total black and white. images go full background-- (white)

I speculate the reason behind it, may be a discriminator issue driving the generator crazy?

@ripperthejack
Copy link
Author

hey bro , have you successfully reproduced this model ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants