You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the second option (where you use RandStainNA() an alternative solution for transformations.Normalize()), for the test time you can either use 1. raw image 2. RandStainNA() together with Test-time augmentation (where the images is augmented with RandStainNA for multiple times) 3. use the hyper-parameter that decides the mean/std of the distribution for normalization. @TumVink
For the second option (where you use RandStainNA() an alternative solution for transformations.Normalize()), for the test time you can either use 1. raw image 2. RandStainNA() together with Test-time augmentation (where the images is augmented with RandStainNA for multiple times) 3. use the hyper-parameter that decides the mean/std of the distribution for normalization. @TumVink
The first option is easy to implement, second can offer some extra performance boost, the third is an trade-off between 1 and 2 based on our experiments.
Heyy,
Thanks for the great work!
However, I am confused about how people should collaborate with your RandStainNA() and transforms.Normalize() techniques?
Is RandStainNA() an alternative solution for transformations?Normalize()? If so, are we supposed to use this technique as well during the test?
BW,
Jingsong
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: