Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Collaborate with transforms.Normalize #9

Open
TumVink opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Collaborate with transforms.Normalize #9

TumVink opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@TumVink
Copy link

TumVink commented Jul 9, 2024

Heyy,

Thanks for the great work!

However, I am confused about how people should collaborate with your RandStainNA() and transforms.Normalize() techniques?

Is RandStainNA() an alternative solution for transformations?Normalize()? If so, are we supposed to use this technique as well during the test?

BW,
Jingsong

@TumVink
Copy link
Author

TumVink commented Jul 12, 2024

@yiqings

@yiqings
Copy link
Owner

yiqings commented Sep 9, 2024

Both shall work as shown in the manuscript.

For the second option (where you use RandStainNA() an alternative solution for transformations.Normalize()), for the test time you can either use 1. raw image 2. RandStainNA() together with Test-time augmentation (where the images is augmented with RandStainNA for multiple times) 3. use the hyper-parameter that decides the mean/std of the distribution for normalization. @TumVink

@yiqings
Copy link
Owner

yiqings commented Sep 9, 2024

Both shall work as shown in the manuscript.

For the second option (where you use RandStainNA() an alternative solution for transformations.Normalize()), for the test time you can either use 1. raw image 2. RandStainNA() together with Test-time augmentation (where the images is augmented with RandStainNA for multiple times) 3. use the hyper-parameter that decides the mean/std of the distribution for normalization. @TumVink

The first option is easy to implement, second can offer some extra performance boost, the third is an trade-off between 1 and 2 based on our experiments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants