-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reproduction about NICO dataset #8
Comments
前辈您好,可以加你的联系方式,请教一下复现的过程嘛! |
@Gaohan123 I meet the same problem as yours. For now, have you solved this problem? |
Actually not... |
@Gaohan123 I met some problems while reproducing the result. How to get the dataset split? Could you provide an example of a structure of the split dataset? Looking forward to your reply |
Personally speaking, I split the dataset following this way. For each class, randomly pick 2 domains as OOD test domain. Rest domains are training domains. In training domains, pick one as the dominant domain and preserve all samples of it. Then other domains are minor domains. I only preserve 20% of dominant domain for minor domains. |
Thanks for your great work!
In your paper, you introduced results for NICO dataset. But in this repo, there is no dataset split file for it. I try to split the dataset according to the description in the paper. Then I try to reproduce experiments of baseline ResNet-18 and StableNet.
The results show that best accuracy of baseline ResNet-18 is 47.71 while in paper it is 51.71. The gap seems small. However, the best accuracy of StableNet is 48.20 while in paper it is 59.76, which is confusing.
I know there are some variance about randomness of data split and difference of hyperparameter tuning. Could you please provide the dataset split file of NICO and recommended hyperparameter setting for it? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: