Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Several Issues about unsupervised segmentation part. #103

Open
RealNewNoob opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Several Issues about unsupervised segmentation part. #103

RealNewNoob opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@RealNewNoob
Copy link

I am trying to reproduce your segmentation research recently. However, I have some problems.
Firstly, I noticed that in the paper, you mentioned lamb was set as 1.5 for COCO3 and PostDam3 and 1.0 for other experiments. However, when I checked the setting for COCO3, I notice the lamd_A = 1.0 and lamd_B = 1.5, and I am a little confused.
In your shared model, I also noticed that take 555 for example, the num_epoches = 4800, while the loss data seems to have 109 rows in total. Does this mean you record it every 4800/109 epochs?
Another question is that shouldn't the minimum of loss _no_lamd be -1 since it is -1*mutual_information? Why the loss drops to a little higher than -1.5? Is the ideal minimum loss affected by the number of clusters?

@RealNewNoob RealNewNoob changed the title Several Issues about segmentation art. Several Issues about unsupervised segmentation part. Feb 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant