-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Satellite observation data #3
Comments
I understand, thank you very much for your response! |
Sorry, my view on LLI was wrong earlier. Here is our decode_rxmrawx function. It detailed how we obtained the SPP_LLI. And the RTK_LLI is obtained by RTK_LLI=SPP_LLI(rover)+SPP_LLI(base). static int8_t decode_rxmrawx(raw_t* raw) {
} |
Thank you for your code. `bool RTKCarrierPhaseFactor::Evaluate(double const* const* parameters, double* residuals, double** jacobians) const {
}` |
Here is a simple correction demo: with db=geometry range between satellite and base station. |
I understand, thank you for your reply! |
Sorry to bother you again. We have encountered a new issue. We checked the u-blox F9p user manual and found that the u-blox F9p receiver does not output the parameters sat_var, ion_var, and trop_var. Could you please tell us how you obtain these parameters? |
function rescode(): |
I understand, thank you for your reply! |
Hello, thank you for your excellent open-source project. May I ask how the following satellite observation data is obtained?
c
uint8_t RTK_LLI[NFREQ]; // RB-SD carrier-phase cycle slip flag
uint8_t SPP_LLI[NFREQ]; // Rover-only carrier-phase cycle slip flag
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: