You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The FFT implemented by numpy is pretty fast, but for some applications it is not preferable to use a CPU (even vectorized and parallel) implementation. Ex: when most GPU cores are taken up with other concurrent dask processes.
There exist a set of GPU python-CUDA bindings provided by several packages out there, so adding the option to do rfft, irfft, fft, and ifft operations may be standardized already.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The FFT implemented by numpy is pretty fast, but for some applications it is not preferable to use a CPU (even vectorized and parallel) implementation. Ex: when most GPU cores are taken up with other concurrent dask processes.
There exist a set of GPU python-CUDA bindings provided by several packages out there, so adding the option to do rfft, irfft, fft, and ifft operations may be standardized already.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: