You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My 2050 build scenario is still spinning but I’m noticing an issue with the project card order that is ignoring pre-reqs.
I have two managed lanes projects (94 NB and 94 SB) that use links created in another project card (mn252 hwy conversion). I set this highway project as a pre-req for both managed lanes. But 94 NB Mnpass ran before the mn252 card, ignoring the pre-req. The 94SB card ran after, correctly following the prereq. The pre-reqs look identical, so I’m confused why this might be. Any idea? I’m hoping when I review outputs tomorrow this won’t be an issue but based on this output message I’m guessing my NB lane will be missing segments.
Full output copied below, important sections highlighted
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Sijia reproduced Rachel's error by using this notebook
The sorting pre-req code is not treat more than one dependent card properly. Instead of overwriting the adjacent_list, it should append. The error is on line 481.
Describe the bug
From Rachel:
My 2050 build scenario is still spinning but I’m noticing an issue with the project card order that is ignoring pre-reqs.
I have two managed lanes projects (94 NB and 94 SB) that use links created in another project card (mn252 hwy conversion). I set this highway project as a pre-req for both managed lanes. But 94 NB Mnpass ran before the mn252 card, ignoring the pre-req. The 94SB card ran after, correctly following the prereq. The pre-reqs look identical, so I’m confused why this might be. Any idea? I’m hoping when I review outputs tomorrow this won’t be an issue but based on this output message I’m guessing my NB lane will be missing segments.
Full output copied below, important sections highlighted
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/28812722/322534406-263d083e-c2e4-419d-bc2a-74d5f92ec063.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.c_PgCkr8X6Yr4HRh31UC3IaVdLD5Lrp2uvSbAjzfSi8)
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Triggering line of code
network_wrangler/network_wrangler/scenario.py
Lines 473 to 486 in 8fa7698
Thoughts on resolution
The sorting pre-req code is not treat more than one dependent card properly. Instead of overwriting the
adjacent_list
, it should append. The error is on line 481.Full stack trace
Environment
Operating system: Win64
Context (conda, jupyter, etc):
Environment (e.g. output from
conda list
):Lasso: develop_with_ranch
Wrangler: develop_with_ranch
fyi: @RachelWikenMC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: