Remove old LV vision example doc #2409
Open
+25,400
−19,029
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
There might not be new ones, but they are still available in LabVIEW |
|
Does it need a whole page for it? Does anyone use them? Are you opposed to removing it? These examples were awesome back when onboard vision was "popular" and the examples were game specific but now that they are 5+ years old and not updated. |
* added python stuff * review comments
* add python for kinematics and odometry * wpimath.geometry and remove type specifics
* Set default image width/alignment in LaTeX build * Actually use the right configuration values * Change default image width to 25em
* Add AdvantageScope docs * Fix trailing newlines * Move AdvantageScope section to "Dashboards" * Split DataLog downloading to separate article * Add AdvantageScope section to swerve drive kinematics page * Fix trailing newlines
* Add a landing page for returning teams Fixes wpilibsuite#1679 Superscedes wpilibsuite#1816 * Fix lint * Address review comments * Update source/docs/yearly-overview/returning-quickstart.rst Co-authored-by: Starlight220 <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Jason Daming <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Starlight220 <[email protected]>
* Update RLIs for 2024.1.1-beta-4 * Autofix RLIs * Manually fix RLIs * Update python latestVersion * Autofix RLIs * Add excludes for files that need larger updates --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions <[email protected]>
Hasn't been needed since 2016
* Update DS article for 2024 DS Update pictures and descriptions Use :kbd: and :guilabel: where appropriate * Update launching log viewer picture
* Update roborio webdashobard for 2024 * Fix lint
* sufficiently neutral? * linting * address review * add described as * Update source/docs/software/dashboards/dashboard-intro.rst Co-authored-by: Starlight220 <[email protected]> * Update source/docs/software/dashboards/dashboard-intro.rst Co-authored-by: Starlight220 <[email protected]> * updated AS description and expanded DS Logs * phrasing * Update source/docs/software/dashboards/dashboard-intro.rst Co-authored-by: Peter Johnson <[email protected]> * Update source/docs/software/dashboards/dashboard-intro.rst Co-authored-by: Peter Johnson <[email protected]> * Update source/docs/software/dashboards/dashboard-intro.rst Co-authored-by: Peter Johnson <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Starlight220 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Peter Johnson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: sciencewhiz <[email protected]>
* add python to mecanum kin and odom * address review * more review items * fixed spacing and link
Fixes deprecation warning
Adds a button to code blocks to copy the code Co-authored-by: Jason Daming <[email protected]>
Based on numerous CD threads there are a lot of acronyms used. Wanted to expand this glossary to include them.
…ite#2743) This should also set the edit on github to main, to reduce the number of PRs to stable
It's easier to enable/disable workflow then change secret
Shouldn't be used for new development and would still be linked in the previous years documentation
Fixes wpilibsuite#2750. The adware version isn't listed on this page
* Add privacy policy * Fix casing of roboRIO Co-authored-by: Gold856 <[email protected]> * Fix link syntax Co-authored-by: Gold856 <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Gold856 <[email protected]>
--------- Co-authored-by: sciencewhiz <[email protected]>
from wpi::Log::BooleanLogEntry to wpi::log::BooleanLogEntry for C++ Co-authored-by: Steephydra393 <[email protected]>
…2684) Control subsystems are full of footguns and are poor abstractions since they don't save any typing, yet they actively bypass the command mutex system. Control commands are also poor abstractions as they are easy to mess up, yet hide internal details away from the user, making debugging harder. They also don't save any typing. --------- Co-authored-by: sciencewhiz <[email protected]>
|
There's conflicts to resolve |
… into removeexample
|
It looks like there was a bad merge |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
They haven't made these in a long time. Nobody will miss this doc