Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is Moelle2011 the right citation? #29

Open
skjerns opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Is Moelle2011 the right citation? #29

skjerns opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@skjerns
Copy link

skjerns commented Jul 13, 2022

Currently, the Moelle2011 spindle detection method is referenced with Moelle, M. et al. J. Neurosci. 22(24), 10941-7 (2002).. There is indeed a publication from Moelle et al. from 2011 available as well, however, it distinguishes between fast and slow spindles, whereas the algorithm implemented (as far as I can see it) does not implement this currently, but more closely resembles the original method of Moelle from 2002.

Would it be more appropriate to rename the method to "Moelle2002" instead? I'm not sure if I'm missing things, just want to make sure I'm referencing the right methods paper in our publication.

@jnobyrne
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for pointing out this inconsistency in our documentation: we should have referenced Moelle et al. 2011 in addition to Moelle et al. 2002. The latter is the original method, but the former is the improved method that we actually implemented, the main difference being an additional smoothing step after creating the RMS signal. So you should probably reference the more recent paper. We will make sure to add Moelle et al. 2011 to the documentation reference list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants